PLD Buyout

hokiecat

hokiecat

Super Star
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
4,290
Here's the cap hit on a buyout per Capfriendly

2024-25 $1,630,952

2025-26 $1,530,952

2026-27 $2,530,952

2027-28 $3,780,952

2028-29 $3,800,952

2029-30 $3,820,952

2030-31 $2,820,952

2031-32 $1,130,952

2032-33 $1,130,952

2033-34 $1,130,952

2034-35 $1,130,952

2035-36 $1,130,952

2036-37 $1,130,952

2037-38 $1,130,952
 
hokiecat said:
Article this morning by Eric D.
theathletic.com

Duhatschek notebook: The L.A. Kings' awkward place with Pierre-Luc Dubois, and draft lottery luck

L.A. has a simple, but expensive, solution to its Dubois problem — admit they made a grievous error and pay the man to go away.
theathletic.com theathletic.com

Hopefully the idea becomes so commonplace in the media that Blake or the new GM have no choice but to do it.

He also suggests Gerard Gallant as a potential Kings coach. I could get behind that choice.
Click to expand...
I am 100% behind hiring Gallant. He's exactly what this team needs, IMHO.
 
hokiecat said:
Article this morning by Eric D.
theathletic.com

Duhatschek notebook: The L.A. Kings' awkward place with Pierre-Luc Dubois, and draft lottery luck

L.A. has a simple, but expensive, solution to its Dubois problem — admit they made a grievous error and pay the man to go away.
theathletic.com theathletic.com

Hopefully the idea becomes so commonplace in the media that Blake or the new GM have no choice but to do it.

He also suggests Gerard Gallant as a potential Kings coach. I could get behind that choice.
Click to expand...

See, that was my point in the other thread. How much is Rob the rookie GM to blame and how much are other people in the organization to blame? There were some great moves he did, and there were some disasters, and I have a hard time believing the same guy was truly behind all of them.

Ilya, PLD, even Fiala (though for an offensively very challenged team that move was understandable)...moves that, in hindsight, yes, smell of "we need stars in LA" mentality, with building a contender not a true priority.

And yes, if those "other people" won't go and only Rob will be let go (if)- THAT is what should worry Kings fans. I suggest you, diehards, should start a petition...not sure anyone smart enough will listen, though...

Bottom line is...Rob shouldn't have quit and then tell you fans that Luc is the bad guy. That's not how one builds himself another shot at a GM position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jom
Statue4Deano said:
Or you get a new coach/offensive system that rewards creativity and watch him score 25-30 goals again.
Click to expand...
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
 
hokiecat said:
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
Click to expand...
This is the point of the buyout. At its peak of 3.8M for two years you’re still saving 4.7M and more/much more the other years. You could well pay Turcotte 4.5M by then and still be in better shape than have this parasite on the team.

Because next part of this equation is this guy hurts you more than helps, even with more points coming. You cannot have a player who quits on plays the way he does and build a winning team. All this talk about buy-in and game management? When the highest paid forward next year simply doesn’t care, how can you hold anyone else truly accountable? They just have to suck it up, work hard, and watch him get paid fat. Just not how it works.

Also, buying him out and kicking him off the beach is a pretty good message for everyone else that an attitude like that is unacceptable.
 
hokiecat said:
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
Click to expand...
He can be traded for a bag of pucks until 7/1
 
hokiecat said:
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
Click to expand...

I didn't disagree with the premise of buying out PLD and that he turned out a massive flop.
 
hokiecat said:
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
Click to expand...
Do tell on the “horribly icky” stuff 😃
 
Good article there on the PLD situation. Although, I've heard the buyout might not be 1/3 of the total as Duhatschek mentions. Not sure about this though....I heard it on a podcast yesterday. It might actually be 2/3 due to PLD's birthdate relative to the end of the NHL year on June 30th.

Anywho, I can say that having Gallant as coach is a good idea....

jom
 
hokiecat said:
Did you read the article or watch him play? How many coaches and second chances are you willing to give PLD? We have 1 shot to release him for a reasonable buyout. After he turns 26, you're stuck with 8.5 million for 7 more years.

I don't know how many times I can explain this to you-- the choice isn't just PLD (hoping he rebounds) or no PLD. The 6-7 million in cap space for the next 7 years could be spent on a puck-moving LD or a center with size who actually competes every shift/game or a plethora of other NHL players. Do you realize there is immense opportunity cost tying up those 8.5 million dollars for 7 years for a roll of the dice that PLD rebounds? We all know how this played out in 2014 with Dean and Mike Richards and the Kings are still paying for it (and had to lie their asses off and throw Richards under the bus with the "horribly icky" things that Richards was doing to get out from under the contract).
Click to expand...
There is an opportunity cost with literally every player on the roster not just Dubois and his $8M cap hit. Cutting him to guarantee a savings because he had an outlier season is shortsighted. It’s actually nothing like the Mike Richards scenario. Richards production was already in decline prior to joining the Kings. His on-ice game really slipped after 2012 and his off-ice issues were established many years prior to his arrest.

Dubois production /60 has been consistent since his second year minus the Covid year and this season. He is who he is. That stability is valuable especially at his age and when you consider the other tangibles to his game there will always be demand for his services.

He is a $6M dollar player as a free agent even with the stink of this season on him. Guaranteed. Yes, Blake did overpay him but that’s the penalty the Kings have to pay for free agents.

If the Kings change their organizational approach to generating offense the team is better with him at his bloated cap hit than buying him out. If they don’t change their approach then I’m right there with you on the buyout.
 
According to everything I heard, Blake is sticking around. And if he's sticking around, PLD isn't getting bought out. Which means they need to utilize him better. He is responsible for his sh*tty play, but they tried to shove a square peg into a round hole on top of it. He is still more than capable of putting up 60-70 points, but he needs wings that can finish and he needs PP time. I'd be interested in seeing what he could do with Fagemo on his wing.
 
santiclaws said:
According to everything I heard, Blake is sticking around. And if he's sticking around, PLD isn't getting bought out. Which means they need to utilize him better. He is responsible for his sh*tty play, but they tried to shove a square peg into a round hole on top of it. He is still more than capable of putting up 60-70 points, but he needs wings that can finish and he needs PP time. I'd be interested in seeing what he could do with Fagemo on his wing.
Click to expand...
Or, put him back on the wing?


Screenshot 2024-05-03 at 13-02-29 Winnipeg Jets 2023 - 2024 Roster Winnipeg Jets.png
 
jom said:
Good article there on the PLD situation. Although, I've heard the buyout might not be 1/3 of the total as Duhatschek mentions. Not sure about this though....I heard it on a podcast yesterday. It might actually be 2/3 due to PLD's birthdate relative to the end of the NHL year on June 30th.

Anywho, I can say that having Gallant as coach is a good idea....

jom
Click to expand...
The buyout window starts after the playoffs end. So if all the series go 7 games and the last Cup Finals game is on 6/24, then the Kings are screwed.

www.sportsnet.ca

Buyout, trade, or keep: What should the Kings do with Pierre-Luc Dubois?

One year ago Pierre-Luc Dubois was traded to Los Angeles and quickly signed an eight-year contract. Now, we wonder if the Kings would consider buying it out. Rory Boylen has more on the options in front of Los Angeles.
www.sportsnet.ca www.sportsnet.ca
 
Statue4Deano said:
There is an opportunity cost with literally every player on the roster not just Dubois and his $8M cap hit. Cutting him to guarantee a savings because he had an outlier season is shortsighted. It’s actually nothing like the Mike Richards scenario. Richards production was already in decline prior to joining the Kings. His on-ice game really slipped after 2012 and his off-ice issues were established many years prior to his arrest.

Dubois production /60 has been consistent since his second year minus the Covid year and this season. He is who he is. That stability is valuable especially at his age and when you consider the other tangibles to his game there will always be demand for his services.

He is a $6M dollar player as a free agent even with the stink of this season on him. Guaranteed. Yes, Blake did overpay him but that’s the penalty the Kings have to pay for free agents.

If the Kings change their organizational approach to generating offense the team is better with him at his bloated cap hit than buying him out. If they don’t change their approach then I’m right there with you on the buyout.
Click to expand...
We'll have to agree to disagree. He's the Huberdeau of 2024. So either the worst or 2nd worst contract in the NHL. There is no way he is a $6M guy. He's the 7th best forward after Byfield, Kopi, Kempe, Danualt, Moore, and Arvy. He's a big guy with no interest in going into the dirty areas or separating opponents from the puck. He has a lot of skill and generates some high-danger opportunities but I don't see how the pluses come close to offsetting the minuses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Now Chirping

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom