Click Here!
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Somebody wants to tax my Snickers?

  1. #11
    1st Scoring Line cybersync's Avatar




    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,561
    Liked
    12 times
    Karma
    1025000
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VEGASKING View Post
    Feel free to shoot me at frozen fury.


    Just how big a tax would it take to stop people from buying junk food? Is another quarter or 50 cents or a dollar going to stop people from buying cookies or ice cream? I don't really buy any and it hasn't stopped me from being overweight. What's next? Tax anything with sugar, fat, or carbohydrates in it?
    VAT, tax everything.

  2. #12
    fantastic hair. lunchbox's Avatar




    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    8,795
    Liked
    833 times
    Karma
    1296545
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    222 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VEGASKING View Post
    Feel free to shoot me at frozen fury.


    Just how big a tax would it take to stop people from buying junk food? Is another quarter or 50 cents or a dollar going to stop people from buying cookies or ice cream? I don't really buy any and it hasn't stopped me from being overweight. What's next? Tax anything with sugar, fat, or carbohydrates in it?
    unfortunately, i won't be there this year because i'll have a little one to take care of by then (or i'll be damned near close to it). you're going to have to make due with just meester i. i know you're totally crushed.


    obviously, taxing snacks isn't the be all and end all of solutions. the suggestion in the link doesn't provide the ultimate answer, but it's a beginning. furthermore, it's not going to solve the problem for everyone since people are fat for a variety of reasons. i was mostly thinking about people who live in less affluent/lower income areas who subsist off of fast food and high sugar foods 24/7 because it's the cheapest alternative.

  3. #13
    FlyinKIng
    Guest

    Default

    Here's a scary thought. The snacks could be HIGHER than last year at the concession stands inside Staples.

  4. #14
    Life is a highway ImA1032's Avatar




    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,704
    Liked
    4 times
    Karma
    1010000
    Images
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbox View Post
    it's not going to solve the problem for everyone since people are fat for a variety of reasons.
    You're right. I say we tax the s*it out of food in general. Anything edible gets hammered. That way the fat bastards will pay through the nose for not controlling their intake.

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyinKIng View Post
    Here's a scary thought. The snacks could be HIGHER than last year at the concession stands inside Staples.
    People actually buy snacks at Staples? Hell, I don't think I've ever noticed snacks getting sold there. Unless you're referring to concessions in general.

    About the only thing I ever buy at a game is a soda or beer, maybe a burger if I'm sitting in the Premier seats and get hungry during the game. That way some wench can bring it to me and I don't miss the game or have to deal with lines. Then again, the walk there and back might be good for me.

    **edit **

    How about the government cranks up the printing press again and gives cash back to lard asses who go out and buy exercise equipment?
    Last edited by ImA1032; August 24th, 2009 at 05:43 PM.

  5. #15
    Team LGK Cross Traffic's Avatar




    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,915
    Liked
    271 times
    Karma
    1257300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    80 Post(s)

    Default

    You're right. I say we tax the s*it out of food in general. Anything edible gets hammered. That way the fat bastards will pay through the nose for not controlling their intake.
    We get that in Idaho, all food is taxed at 6% along with everything else, we do get a $30 credit off the income tax. (so our first $500 of food is not taxed)

  6. #16
    soddoff




    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,584
    Liked
    33 times
    Karma
    1000000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Some of us do control our food intake, do not eat a lot of "crap" food, have a peanut butter cup maybe once a week, are unable to do a lot of exercise due to serious back and knee problems (two knee replacements due to degenerative arthritis). Yes, some of us do have a weight problem, not due to any of the above listed habits. Yes, I do get offended at being called "lard ass", "fatty" and various other names.

  7. #17
    Unfiltered
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbox View Post
    you're going to have to make due with just meester i.
    Mr. I will be hanging out with my fat ass, so it'll be fine.

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbox View Post
    i was mostly thinking about people who live in less affluent/lower income areas who subsist off of fast food and high sugar foods 24/7 because it's the cheapest alternative.
    They'll just get more food stamps.

  8. #18
    Part of the "Quick" Crowd Royal_Roader's Avatar




    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,457
    Liked
    143 times
    Karma
    1000000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    12 Post(s)

    Default

    I have several issues with "sin taxes," such as gas, alcohol. tobacco, and junk food.

    1) Within 2 years, the money starts being used to fund things other than what it was intended to when first announced.

    2) They fail terribly at behavior modification for people above a certain income level. A lot of people still drive SUVs, and some will still be overweight from fancy ass desserts every day.

    3) State and local govts become as addicted to the revenue as people are to the vice being taxed. As a result, the budget people never figure out that when people stop buying Snickers or Bud or Sunoco, the incoming revenue goes down, not up. They came to the stark realization that even though people are driving 5-10% fewer miles, most drivers still expect to get 100% across the bridges.

  9. #19
    Waiting for the night Creeping Death's Avatar




    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    7,422
    Liked
    94 times
    Karma
    1040100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    15 Post(s)

    Default

    This will do nothing but tax the poor.
    And thats how you get ants!

  10. #20
    FlyinKIng
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creeping Death View Post
    This will do nothing but tax the poor.
    This. Ask yourself this question, if your standing in the grocery store line, how much would it take for you NOT to buy the Snickers that your craving? $3 , $4? You already do at the movies or game.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28