Attendance down across the league and if you thought the NHL made for good TV before you probably question it now.
Case in point-Last nights Calgary vs Phoenix game. Calgary has a healthy lead and the Frustrated Yotes start taking the body and Calgary starts responding back in kind. But not wanting the game to "get out of hand" the refs start calling every ticky tack penalty they can find completly killing what little enjoyment there was in watching the final 5-10 minutes of the game including the worlds worst hooking penalty called on Roman Hamrlik. If Hooking is defined as "having ones stick in the general vicinity of an opponents leg" then I guess it was a great call.
I really see the NHL as having the worst case of timing of any sport. When it was the 70/80s they just didnt get the exposure that other sports got in spite of the scoring/physical play./rivalries the game offered.
Once Gretz and Lemieux came to to forefront it brought added exposure and interest but once again there just wasnt enough coverage to pay dividends. I remember sitting in a sportsbar in 1988 watching the Hartford Whalers on satellite and considering myself lucky since this was a rarity. Remember the Hextall/Chelios incident? How about the Isles/Rangers grudge match? Well you probably dont remember unless you shelled out the cash to pay to get ZTV/SportsChannel. The brilliant decision to give the NHL playoffs to a pay tv service which also pre-emtped hockeys game to show preseason Clippers basketball.
Fast forward to the 90s expansion and a wide open game brought arguably the most interest to the NHL ever. The game had a nice balance of toughness and skill which made it great to watch. Fighters like Bob Probert/Marty Mcsorely/Joey Kocur were as popular as Gretzky and Yzerman. The National Sports Newspaper had extensive features about the legendary Probert/Troy Crowder fights.
Using this as a springboard to expansion and a cash grab the NHL overexpands-thus seeing players with no business being in yesterdays NHL all of a sudden thrust into the limelight; Scoring Plummets. Coaches with an eye on the bottom line of Wins and Losses simply start playing a counter punch/trapping style to stay in games.
Surprise Surprise people start losing interest as the trapping clutch and grab lies in direct contrast to the high flying 80s/early 90's brand of hockey.
Then hopping on the politically correct bandwagon-the powers that be somehow think that ramping up scoring and eliminating fighting may somehow bring NBA style results of viewership to the NHL-while diehard fans are left with a shell of a former great game and diehards fans expressing less interest in games(me included.)
In a time when the UFC/Pride Fighting/Nascar are ratings winners-the NHL takes one of its most marketable aspects out of the game. In a time when the NHL is trying to bring in new fans and new viewers-it adopts a policy that actually makes the game harder to watch for the casual fan and less enjoyable for the diehard fan.
Someone said it in another thread-the solution to the NHLs problems wasnt adopting a salary cap; it should have been contraction. Take 4 teams out of the NHL and disburse those 4 teams players amungst the rest and you would have an across the board raising of the overall skill level that by itself would have increased scoring without resorting to calling 20 minors a game simply to boost Power Play scoring.
The NHL historically has had horrible timing and the new rules changes reflect that. In an era when the UFC is selling out staples center and making gazilions through pay per view the NHL has teams that are forced to buy their own air time. Go figure.
Thats my rant for the day. Thanks for reading.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote

Dr. Naysay

