not remotely, but fine, whatever.
as of today, i don't think any of us know the cause of her death. we suspect with great probability on our side that it was related to her lifestyle.
i find the casualness with regard to the potential and highly probable causes for that lifestyle to be disconcerting.
this woman was bi-polar, had an eating disorder and was a heavy user... and some of you can't see a clear mental problem here? she also had COPD to boot.
Of course it was! I'm sure she signed a waiver legally declaring so as well.
I understand 100% how addiction can alter brain chemistry. I understand 100% how certain individuals can do as much as they want and give it up no problem while others do it once and are addicted for life. I also understand the very good point that substance abuse is secondary in the so-called 'disease' of addiction. With all that said, I'm making a personal choice NOT to lump addicts in the same boat as children born with leukemia or other conditions that are acquired innocently. Even someone who has unprotected sex and gets AIDS will get less sympathy from me than those who are born with it or acquired it through blood transfusion. I'm not saying it's not a tragedy but I hope you all get my point.
If you struggle with addiction, get in line because there are a lot of other people in this world who I have far more pity for.
Amy Winehouse was the proto-typical example of an addicitve personality, it transcended drugs to alcohol and probably the worst of all addictions was the one to her boyfriend, she was as dependant on him as she was for a hit of what ever she was taking.
The orginial argument was intelligence being linked to her and I guess others addicitve personality and that is plain wrong. Are some people seriously suggesting that an addict who decides to get help has basically a higher I.Q. than someone who doesen't?
No offense taken. I know you're not calling me out. And lets throw weed out of the equation b/c that doesn't even count. I've smoked everyday for years and just stopped b/c I felt that I was smoking too much. I'd take a few months off and then if I wanted to I'd start again. I didn't have any withdrawls.
Now when talking about harder drugs like speed, heroine I think the portion of people who just stop cold turkey after its become a habit is pretty small.
Like you said this is just something that we disagree on and that is cool. But let me throw this your way. I think that we both would agree that addiction and diabetes are for the most part preventable and self inflicted "ailments" (I use that word b/c you don't like disease for addiction, trying to be fair). So.....would calling diabetes a bonafide disease be a disservice to the word "disease" b/c its self inflicted and completely preventable by living a healthy lifestyle?
I get what you are saying and respect it. I just have a different outlook on it. I know that my brother doesn't want to relapse. He went 16 months clean. The longest stretch in 15-20 years. On the surface everything was good, not perfect. I talked to him 36 hours before he relapsed. He was coming up that weekend for our moms birthday. I do believe there is some personal accountability involved here. But are also some serious demons at work here.
Whatever your stance on it is disease, ailment etc....its a tragic, tragic thing that no deserves. The sad truth is that I will probably lose my oldest brother to this. And that is ****ing devastating thing to try and come to grips with.
Frozen Fury, the only reason you can't wait for summer to end!![]()
Well said. I don't know if they have to be mutually exclusive honestly. But the fact is, after years of addiction the brain chemistry has been changed and parts of the brain just don't function how they used to. But I do firmly believe that the way addiction is treated needs to change. How? I'm not really sure.
Frozen Fury, the only reason you can't wait for summer to end!![]()
Frozen Fury, the only reason you can't wait for summer to end!![]()