I plan to. If it ever comes up on TCM again.
I plan to. If it ever comes up on TCM again.
Oh, and is the Godfather 2 really better than the first one? I don't see it. :O
Several of the films on the list, Kane among them, are elevated when considered with relation to cinematic technical and/or real-life historical (though mainly the former) context.
Overall, it's an odd sort of top 50. It feels somewhat personal, and often seems to purposefully stray from the expected. Some of the films on the list probably benefit from current trends or recent presentation of the films themselves or the filmmakers. Some of the odd quirks in the list make it feel to me sort of like, for example, the discussion of who is the greatest center in NBA history. I suppose that's what makes these kinds of lists fun, though.
Godfather is better simply because of James 'Sonny' Caan. I will tolerate NO argument on this.
This!!!
Dunno, the first Godfather isn't as accomplished as the second, but dammit, so iconic. If my memory serves me right, Caan has a cameo in the second, but primadonna, lol, Brando decided not to be in the second.
But anyways, what somebody told me, these films are really about Pacino's character. And in the first film, he is pretty much a victim of circumstance, but it the second film he goes all sort of Machiavellian, and that makes the second film, maybe?
the first one is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO nuanced and far better. at some point it became chic to believe II was better, and it never looked back. i think it has a lot to do with De Niro coming hard off Mean Streets into a young Vito Corleone... and culminated with Taxi Driver like a year later.
his hot snatch era.
there isn't ONE scene in either of the sequels that, to me, can touch the moment Michael goes to the hospital to visit Vito unattended, up through to the point when Enzo lights his cig... IMPACT!