
Originally Posted by
Dr. Naysay
As much as it pains me to admit it... there's obviously a highly subjective element to "funny".
What makes me laugh may not make you laugh and vice versa... so when I look at something and try to determine how "clever" or "funny" I think it is I try to use these gauges.
Degree of difficulty
You may not find Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm or Arrested Development to be "funny" but you have to acknowledge the skill with which the plots are constructed and woven together.
Parody/Satire
You may not find The Simpsons or South Park to be "funny" but (on fewer and fewer occasions with the Simpsons) you have to acknowledge the (sometimes admittedly low) degree to which they are successfully lampooning something.
Fearlessness of performance
You may not find Sacha Baron Cohen or Anthony Jeselnick to be "funny" but you have to acknowledge their fearlessness in taking a character into thoroughly unlikable waters.
MacGruber wasn't the most brilliantly conceived story but it lampooned 80's action films flawlessly and it was utterly fearless in the lengths it would go to for a laugh and most of the jokes were clever, creative or daring enough that I would consider the "degree of difficulty" to be raised several notches above something like "Big Momma's House" or "Larry The Cable Guy : Health Inspector".
MacGruber may not be your cup of tea but I challenge anybody to suggest that the people who made it aren't funny, aren't talented or didn't know precisely what they were making.
**** you guys. This movie is awesome.