176Likes -
November 30th, 2009, 04:49 PM #1801 
Sounds cool, just no more "Things You See on a Southwest Airlines Tarmac" themes. That one was hard as hell.
For most of us, anyway...
-
November 30th, 2009, 05:16 PM #1802 Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Bullets are cheap. Life is priceless. 
-
November 30th, 2009, 05:29 PM #1803 Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Bullets are cheap. Life is priceless.
-
December 2nd, 2009, 02:35 PM #1804
-
December 3rd, 2009, 10:02 AM #1805
istockphoto.com accepted my "Grains in the Sun" photo as a stock photo. It's only the second pic that I have had accepted because their requirements are so stringent that nearly any photo from a "pro-sumer" camera is too noisy. Looks like I found the remedy for that! Time to start taking a lot more stock pics alongside the usual stuff!
-
December 3rd, 2009, 03:53 PM #1806 Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Bullets are cheap. Life is priceless.
-
December 6th, 2009, 06:38 PM #1807
-
December 10th, 2009, 11:40 AM #1808
My captive subject
-
December 10th, 2009, 01:16 PM #1809
Good stuff. Nice DoF and perfect lighting and focus.
Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Bullets are cheap. Life is priceless.
-
December 14th, 2009, 10:49 AM #1810
I was curious if anyone here has any hands on experience with the 7D. I currently have a 30D and was headed to get the 50D until I saw this one came out. I currently have a 24-70 2.8L that I use as my everyday lense and was going to purchase a 70-200 2.8L to go with it. I photograph my son mostly as hes getting into sports now.
Also, after doing some reading it seems the 70-200 non IS is the way to go for shooting mostly moving objects and the IS is best suited for still shots. Any truth to that from anyone with experience with them?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
PuckMonkey
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
