February 15th, 2011, 03:20 PM #2001
Great composition on that shot. I love it.
February 15th, 2011, 04:40 PM #2002
February 15th, 2011, 08:07 PM #2003
March 11th, 2011, 01:25 PM #2004
Wanted to post this up for all of you. I say give it a shot. I'm going to.
9th Annual Photo Contest | Photo Contest | Smithsonian Magazine
Also, I was looking at picking up [ame="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00007GQLU/ref=s9_simh_bw_p23_d0_i5?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_ rd_s=gp-center-3&pf_rd_r=18M2F1VG2FWFX9QNBTNH&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p =1289760502&pf_rd_i=502394"]this lens[/ame] and wanted to know if any of you had had any experience with it. Was looking at the 100mm one as well, but based on the 1.6x and some readings of reviews, I think I'm going to go with the 85mm instead. Thoughts?
March 11th, 2011, 08:32 PM #2005
Nope, I blew my money on the 50mm F/1.2 prime instead.
Originally Posted by SmytheKing
March 27th, 2011, 12:43 PM #2006
Originally Posted by Fisch
All I hear is great things about that lens. It is supposed to be the best bang for your buck lens in the line up. It's gotta be fun for low light shots.
March 27th, 2011, 02:34 PM #2007
Bang for the buck, I don't know...it's still ****ing expensive compared to Canon's non-L series 50mm primes. haha.
Originally Posted by rinkrat
I figure the place to put the money investment is the glass so I don't consider non-L series when I'm buying Canon's own product.
March 30th, 2011, 07:12 PM #2008
April 6th, 2011, 11:10 AM #2009
April 6th, 2011, 01:49 PM #2010