Click Here!
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: .wav vs. .mp3 and how do I compress them without losing qualiuty??? *HALP*

  1. #1
    Hating ties is dumb. Dr. Naysay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,818
    Liked
    1981 times
    Karma
    57400318

    Default .wav vs. .mp3 and how do I compress them without losing qualiuty??? *HALP*

    I'll use this one sound clip I'm working with as an example but in general I would love to know the solution to this problem...


    I have a .wav file that's 2:01 long and it's 10.1 MB.
    (705kpbs) not sure if that's relevant or not...

    I can convert it to an .mp3 and it drops to 824KB
    (54kbps) still not sure if that's relevant or not...

    Anyway....

    Is there any reliable way to compress it as a .wav file and still maintain relative audio quality? Without spending a lot of money on audio editing equipment?

    Thanks in advance...

  2. #2
    I'M THIRTY-SEVEN? DanteHicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,692
    Liked
    64 times
    Karma
    2834211

    Default

    FLAC - Free Lossless Audio Codec

    No such thing as a lossless mp3.

  3. #3
    Team LGK waterboy100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,862
    Liked
    556 times
    Karma
    1508976

    Default

    no such thing as a compressed wav file.

    Use flac as mentioned above.

    R.I.P LeRoi 1961-2008

    Quote Originally Posted by SmokinJayz View Post
    More like Kings will NOT make the playoffs. You can quote me on that.

  4. #4
    Hating ties is dumb. Dr. Naysay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,818
    Liked
    1981 times
    Karma
    57400318

    Default

    I don't really understand what those words mean...


    EDIT : But thanks very much. I'll familiarize myself with it post haste!!!

  5. #5
    Everybody relax, I'm here KingThomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,314
    Liked
    433 times
    Karma
    3149695

    Default

    as an audiophile, I love what modern technology has to offer, but digital loss always bums me out.
    waterboy100 likes this.

  6. #6
    #1 fan VEGASKING's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,967
    Liked
    55 times
    Karma
    11373212

    Default

    You need to encode it to a higher quality mp3. 192k or even higher and not 54k, which is ****. Every convertor program should have a setting to choose what bitrate to encode it at.

  7. #7
    Available for Parties seraphim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    4,575
    Liked
    28 times
    Karma
    10346538

    Default

    you should be able to convert to a lossless wma as well.

  8. #8
    The gates have opened RoyalPain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    4,648
    Liked
    1 times
    Karma
    1984632

    Default

    You can't have compression without Loss!!!
    Last edited by RoyalPain; April 12th, 2011 at 12:29 PM.

  9. #9
    The Godfather rinkrat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    205,914
    Liked
    6333 times
    Karma
    761471726
    Images
    6262

    Default

    You can make it mp3 but use a real high sampling rate like 320 and only your dog will hear the difference.

  10. #10
    I'M THIRTY-SEVEN? DanteHicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,692
    Liked
    64 times
    Karma
    2834211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RoyalPain View Post
    You can't have compression without Loss!!!
    Not true. FLAC is compression without loss.
    waterboy100 likes this.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27