Thread: The disallowed goal last night

Originally Posted by jt

I have that jersey...it's just not game worn.

A buddy of mine did that to a girl's jersey who sat in front of us at the Ponda. Dropped a fork of Nachos in her hair and jersey on accident.

Also, how did Doughty know it was nacho cheese? No, please don't tell me he tasted it!

Originally Posted by maxwellsmart

a buddy of mine did that to a girl's jersey who sat in front of us at the ponda. Dropped a fork of nachos in her hair and jersey on "accident".

ftfy?

Originally Posted by Peggy_GKG

Either way it was clearly a goal and the whistle blew a split second before the puck crossed the line.

Huh? If the whistle blew before the puck crossed the line (as it certainly did), how do you figure "it was clearly a goal"?

The rule on the whistle is that, even if the puck had crossed the line BEFORE the whistle blew, the ref can rule it a no-goal if he intended to blow the whistle before the puck crossed the line.

Originally Posted by jeffersonw

Shouldn't there have been a minor penalty to the Oilers once the fans started throwing stuff on the ice?

Who cares, they wouldn't have scored.

Originally Posted by coop21

Sutter mentioned this rule in his post-game press conference. Then made a crack about how the league had to be thrilled with the way the game was officiated.

DS should pay the fine in pennies...

Originally Posted by Pucker25

You got it backwards. The ref can call no goal based on when he intended to blow the whistle. Also, the whistle clearly blew before the puck crossed the line. The ref cannot "un-blow" a whistle.

This meant the ref sucked and blew at the same time...

Originally Posted by Ecktore

lol, but I they're talking about the Kings second goal that was disallowed, not the Oilers first goal that was disallowed. Either way, funny stuff.

Actually, that was the SECOND Oilers goal not allowed. The first one was earlier in the game when the ref lost sight of the puck, thought Quick had it and blew the whistle right before Nail shot it in the net. Officiating was horrendous, sure, but I'd rather it be horrendous for BOTH sides than biased towards one side. Two 3 on 5 opportunities and...nothing. Pathetic. And when I say nothing I mean player movement...let alone scoring a damn goal.

Originally Posted by boy1der

Actually, that was the SECOND Oilers goal not allowed. The first one was earlier in the game when the ref lost sight of the puck, thought Quick had it and blew the whistle right before Nail shot it in the net. Officiating was horrendous, sure, but I'd rather it be horrendous for BOTH sides than biased towards one side. Two 3 on 5 opportunities and...nothing. Pathetic. And when I say nothing I mean player movement...let alone scoring a damn goal.

Seriously that first one was so far after the whistle I was surprised there wasn't an unsportsmanlike penalty. There was no disallowing, it was a wtf are you doing.

Originally Posted by jt

I have that jersey...it's just not game worn.

Yea, my brother has one similar, it has mustard on it thanks to Warren Rychel who was eating a hot dog while signing his jersey years ago at the fire and ice celebrity game at the Pond. remember that one?

On another funny note, biznasty threw my at the time 3 year old daughter a puck during game 4 warmups of the WCF and it landed straight in my beer. ahh, the memories. He owes me $11.