Click Here!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Like Tree21Likes

Thread: How much experience was gained by losing Kopitar in 2011?

  1. #11
    Concussed Villain Mondo Blando's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,870
    Liked
    1421 times
    Karma
    29919511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Naysay View Post
    3 of the 4 Centers on the Kings 2012 Stanley Cup winning team didn't play for the Kings in the 2011 Playoffs.
    King, Nolan, Fraser, Carter, Richards, Voynov, Loktionov and Gagne didn't play for the Kings in the 2011 Playoffs.
    Scuderi, Penner and Williams had all won the Stanley Cup prior to the 2011 Playoffs.
    Dustin Brown was a different player after the trade rumors.

    Clifford was the big surprise in 2011.... barely factored into 2012.


    The older the get and the more teams get overhauled each off season the less I believe the "you got to learn to lose before you learn to win" mantra that some people love so much.
    Quick is really the only player who arguably used the previous season as a springboard into 2011-12. Brown, and Doughty to a less obvious degree, "flipped the switch" heading into the last quarter of the season and throughout the playoffs.

    I still say that the Richards acquisition wasn't made with the intent of fast-forwarding the team's development as much as it was an indictment of the players that fell apart over the course of the previous two playoff years. There had to be some grit and win-at-all-costs attitude at the top of the lineup that was either flat-out missing or needed to be coddled out. Maybe Schenn would have brought it eventually, but there had to be a personality change, more of a respected killer instinct attitude that was missing in Kopitar and Brown. Maybe Dustin had it all along and just didn't know how to channel it, maybe Richards' presence allowed him to ease into that kind of approach, or maybe the trade rumors woke him up. Probably all three. But I don't think the previous series losses were valuable as "experience" as much as they were a course in What Needs To Change.

  2. #12
    Hating ties is dumb. Dr. Naysay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,819
    Liked
    1983 times
    Karma
    57400318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mondo Blando View Post
    Quick is really the only player who arguably used the previous season as a springboard into 2011-12.
    You know there's still some people who will argue that Bernier should have started Game 5 against the Sharks?

  3. #13
    ^this guy sucks^ Lappy!'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,523
    Liked
    1197 times
    Karma
    72025933

    Default

    Experience gained by the Kings losing Kopi in 2011 > Experience gained by the NHL losing a season in 2004
    LOSTcauseZERO, jammer06 and Henrik like this.
    ^This post is completely idiotic, don't read it.^

  4. #14
    Let's hug it out, bitch! NastiMarvasti's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,465
    Liked
    1449 times
    Karma
    10835418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Naysay View Post
    3 of the 4 Centers on the Kings 2012 Stanley Cup winning team didn't play for the Kings in the 2011 Playoffs.
    King, Nolan, Fraser, Carter, Richards, Voynov, Loktionov and Gagne didn't play for the Kings in the 2011 Playoffs.
    Scuderi, Penner and Williams had all won the Stanley Cup prior to the 2011 Playoffs.
    Dustin Brown was a different player after the trade rumors.

    Clifford was the big surprise in 2011.... barely factored into 2012.


    The older the get and the more teams get overhauled each off season the less I believe the "you got to learn to lose before you learn to win" mantra that some people love so much.
    The supporting cast changed quite a bit but other than Johnson, the core was the same. Kopitar, Brown, Doughty, and Quick. They were arguably the top 4 players in the playoffs and they all got Conn Smythe consideration.

    Also, I cannot think of the last time a team won it all without it's core players experiencing some kind of difficult loss beforehand.

  5. #15
    Hating ties is dumb. Dr. Naysay's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18,819
    Liked
    1983 times
    Karma
    57400318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NastiMarvasti View Post
    The supporting cast changed quite a bit but other than Johnson, the core was the same. Kopitar, Brown, Doughty, and Quick. They were arguably the top 4 players in the playoffs and they all got Conn Smythe consideration.

    Also, I cannot think of the last time a team won it all without it's core players experiencing some kind of difficult loss beforehand.
    But isn't that just a fact of life? How many true prodigies simply appear on the big stage and dazzle everybody without any learning curve or early failures?

    I don't think you "have to lose" in order to "learn how to win".... I just think 99.9% of people in the world ultimately suffer some form of failure or setback in every human endeavor anyone attempted ever. At anything.

    So yes... inevitably those who succeed will look back and say "Well we had to lose first."

    It's like finding your keys and then suggesting "It's always the last place you look" as some kind of insight.

  6. #16
    Enjoy the chaos King'sPawn's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    8,928
    Liked
    685 times
    Karma
    34403728

    Default

    I thought the Kings only learned how to get by without a "passenger," right, folks?

  7. #17
    Concussed Villain Mondo Blando's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,870
    Liked
    1421 times
    Karma
    29919511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King'sPawn View Post
    I thought the Kings only learned how to get by without a "passenger," right, folks?
    No, but you would be willing to entertain the notion that the reason that a blood & guts guy like Richards at the top of the line up was absolutely necessary was because of the lack of killer instinct displayed by Kopitar and Brown in the previous two seasons?

    The fact that the Kings won a Cup without Anze having his "break out" season is a testament to the depth and character of the team. And it's not as though he played poorly in the playoffs - far from it. The St. Louis and Phoenix series were awesome displays from Kopitar, the best hockey he has ever played in my opinion. Aside from the key OT goal in Game 1 in Jersey, Anze didn't have as much to do with determining the outcome of the Vancouver and New Jersey series.

    The team won without Kopitar being the huge factor. I didn't think that would happen - I thought Anze would have to grow considerably in order to acheive that level of team success. I have stated over and over how I believe that Anze has another level to rise too, and he is definitely capable of it. If he does "break out", which I believe will happen if he has a more consistent effort throughout the year, he will be one of the very best players in the league. But he isn't there yet. It's great to know that he doesn't have to do it for the teams sake, but still, for a player of skill and size, he should be more of a threat during the months in which he traditionally relaxes. That could be a significant factor in the team winning a division and avoiding late season rallies just to make the playoffs.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27