Islanders claim Hickey, Nashville claims Clune

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jt

I think any GM who thought Hickey still had upside would have offered something for him, thinking that if he had upside a team with a higher waiver pick would take him (which is exactly what happened). I'm sure that's exactly what DL would have told, say, the Flyers: "Hey I'm going to put Hickey on waivers and a team like the Islanders or Blue Jackets are probably going to take him, making him ineligible for you to acquire him...I'll take a 4th rounder for him. What do you think?" In fact, I bet that's why the rumor got out there that he was on waivers a day before he was actually on waivers---so it would drum up any interest (of which there apparently wasn't any).

---

I'm sure this is exactly what happened. And it says something about Hickey that Deano couldn't get a bite on Hickey from a good team. We will never know if Hickey had every got a chance what he could do. Then again, the 6 people the Kings have on the back line are pretty darn good, pretty sure Hickey could never beat out even Marty or Slava.

And I wish Richie Clune well. Kid has a huge heart and played hard every shift. But he just didn't have NHL quality skills and he'd never beat out Clifford or Nolan for a spot on the Kings. Which makes it surprising that the Preds wanted him. But I wish Richie well.

Crazy to the think Westgarth had more trade value than Hickey. Ouch.

again, i'm not so sure the whole sitch was as nuanced as some of you are making it out to be. Hickey was waiver eligible, ergo, had to clear waivers to be sent to Manchester (like he would have in September), that's it. he wasn't going to crack the roster this season, and i highly doubt Lombardi was all too eager to cut bait on him regardless of his draft position or perceived trade value - i think that has more to do with some around here STILL hoping to poke more holes in Dean's game.

Hickey was not only one of the best defensemen in Manchester, he also wore an 'A'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gescom

again, i'm not so sure the whole sitch was as nuanced as some of you are making it out to be. Hickey was waiver eligible, ergo, had to clear waivers to be sent to Manchester (like he would have in September), that's it. he wasn't going to crack the roster this season, and i highly doubt Lombardi was all too eager to cut bait on him regardless of his draft position or perceived trade value - i think that has more to do with some around here STILL hoping to poke more holes in Dean's game.

Hickey was not only one of the best defensemen in Manchester, he also wore an 'A'.

---

Right. And so, WHILE IT ISN'T A HUGE BIG DEAL AND DOESN'T NEGATE LOMBARDI'S VALUE AFTER WE WON THE CUP, it was still a ****up on his part and Garth Snow is still a dick.

Hickey and Lubo on the PP!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adgy-san

Right. And so, WHILE IT ISN'T A HUGE BIG DEAL AND DOESN'T NEGATE LOMBARDI'S VALUE AFTER WE WON THE CUP, it was still a ****up on his part and Garth Snow is still a dick.

---

i still don't see the f*** up, it was s.o.p. Snow may indeed be a dick, but i'm hanging 98% of this on the Cookie Monster!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gescom

i still don't see the f*** up, it was s.o.p. Snow may indeed be a dick, but i'm hanging 98% of this on the Cookie Monster!

---

Yeah, i mis-read the bit in your post about him having to clear waivers to play in MCH. So, ok, no fault to Lombardi.

Garth Snow is a dick and Lubo is a bitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jt

I think any GM who thought Hickey still had upside would have offered something for him, thinking that if he had upside a team with a higher waiver pick would take him (which is exactly what happened). I'm sure that's exactly what DL would have told, say, the Flyers: "Hey I'm going to put Hickey on waivers and a team like the Islanders or Blue Jackets are probably going to take him, making him ineligible for you to acquire him...I'll take a 4th rounder for him. What do you think?" In fact, I bet that's why the rumor got out there that he was on waivers a day before he was actually on waivers---so it would drum up any interest (of which there apparently wasn't any).

---

Hickey had to clear waivers to stay in the AHL on any team. The Isles can't send him down without offering him back up. He stays in NY for the rest if the year, or they potentially lose him, possibly back to us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adgy-san

...and Lubo is a bitch.

---

http://www.jeffnamnum.com/wp-content...hocked-kid.jpg

More memory refreshers, I think but am not positive this is all due to the kings calling all the players up after the AHL season to be able to keep practicing with the team during the playoff run. I may be wrong on that

Waivers clarification, and a signing « LA Kings Insider