Click Here!
Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 121
Like Tree67Likes

Thread: All Purpose Trade Deadline Thread

  1. #101
    I'llPutPenniesOnYourEyes jerseydevil's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    29,354
    Liked
    4036 times
    Karma
    31419209

    Default

    Hello bus...meet Rick Nash. Yeah, Howson is all but gone and the fans have to be relieved that if Nash does go it won't be him handling the deal. There are a lot of issues in Columbus and they fans are tired of it. Howson tried to redirect the frustration and we will see how that works. Note to Nash, if you really want out...you have to be a little more flexible. Columbus has no compulsion to trade you and certainly not to a team that will fleece them. Either shut up and play or give your team some room to work with. Not saying you have to ok a trade to the worst team in the league, oh wait...second worst team in the league, but you gotta have some wiggle.

  2. #102
    devenir gris gescom's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    32,019
    Liked
    2136 times
    Karma
    101829081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerseydevil View Post
    Hello bus...meet Rick Nash. Yeah, Howson is all but gone and the fans have to be relieved that if Nash does go it won't be him handling the deal. There are a lot of issues in Columbus and they fans are tired of it. Howson tried to redirect the frustration and we will see how that works. Note to Nash, if you really want out...you have to be a little more flexible. Columbus has no compulsion to trade you and certainly not to a team that will fleece them. Either shut up and play or give your team some room to work with. Not saying you have to ok a trade to the worst team in the league, oh wait...second worst team in the league, but you gotta have some wiggle.
    problem is... he signed the contract that was offered to him - which included that clause.

    Columbus has shot themselves in both feet.
    Kubrick likes this.

  3. #103
    I'llPutPenniesOnYourEyes jerseydevil's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    29,354
    Liked
    4036 times
    Karma
    31419209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gescom View Post
    problem is... he signed the contract that was offered to him - which included that clause.

    Columbus has shot themselves in both feet.

    Certainly you mean a clause that limits teams and not that he can force them to trade him. That was my point. They are not obligated in any way shape or form to trade him. If he wants to go so badly he might need to add some more teams to the list. You gotta give to get.
    Drunken Crunker likes this.

  4. #104
    devenir gris gescom's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    32,019
    Liked
    2136 times
    Karma
    101829081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerseydevil View Post
    Certainly you mean a clause that limits teams and not that he can force them to trade him. That was my point. They are not obligated in any way shape or form to trade him. If he wants to go so badly he might need to add some more teams to the list. You gotta give to get.

    rarely if ever am i on the side of a player in these sort of circumstances... when it was the CBJ braintrust mulling the idea of moving Nash, you're right, they were under no obligation to move him. now, after the lame-duck GM publicly throws your franchise plaeyer and team captain under the bus, you HAVE to trade him. this issue has ramifications that go well beyond Rick Nash... they'll end up with 9 Vaclav Prospals on their team every year.

  5. #105
    2nd Scoring Line vannuxforlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    273
    Liked
    48 times
    Karma
    504308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drunken Crunker View Post
    Sounds like the plan is to put Kassian in right away.

    Definitely addressed the size and grit issue many felt the Canucks had.
    yep. And with Ballard hurt Gragnani will have an immediate impact too. Though if recent D acquisitions are any indication he's going to have a tough time with the system at first. That said I think the plan of Ballard-Tanev as the third pairing in the playoffs is still intact.

    As for the trade, call it emotional attachment I suppose, with everyone talking about how this is a good but risky trade for both sides I have a hard time seeing that. I get adding grit to the 2nd line but ultimately the Canucks have been touting how scoring was the issue. Well, Hodgson has helped scoring and helped make a 2nd viable power play unit. Kassian meanwhile might have more upside long term for the team (ultimately where the hell was Hodgson going to be play behind Sedin and Kesler) but I think Vancouver actually shot itself in the foot a bit this season. Unless they somehow make Kassian work for them.

    I didn't think Hodgson was getting moved and wonder if we had openly shopped him if we could've gotten a better deal. Further I'm surprised of the two blue chip prospects it wasn't Schneider that got traded but I think deep down Gillis still isn't sure what to do with him. Draft day deal most likely.

    As for the Columbus situation I can't believe he threw Nash under the bus like that. It will be an interesting draft day.
    Drunken Crunker likes this.

  6. #106
    I'llPutPenniesOnYourEyes jerseydevil's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    29,354
    Liked
    4036 times
    Karma
    31419209

    Default

    Still think a change in GM could soothe things in Ohio. New guy comes in, says all the right things, ownership places all the blame on Howson. Unlikely, but it could happen.Nash does not seem like the grudge-y type. I guess we will just have to wait and see.
    Noble Savage likes this.

  7. #107
    jt
    jt is offline
    Bartender on Dry Island jt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    15,854
    Liked
    373 times
    Karma
    8878270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gescom View Post
    rarely if ever am i on the side of a player in these sort of circumstances... when it was the CBJ braintrust mulling the idea of moving Nash, you're right, they were under no obligation to move him. now, after the lame-duck GM publicly throws your franchise plaeyer and team captain under the bus, you HAVE to trade him. this issue has ramifications that go well beyond Rick Nash... they'll end up with 9 Vaclav Prospals on their team every year.
    Does it matter if the franchise player and team captain's agent threw the team under the bus (by listing the 5 teams) before the team threw the player under the bus?

    And does it matter that the player with the no trade clause demanded a trade in the first place?

  8. #108
    Frozen Fury JACKPOT!! dgrycan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    10,171
    Liked
    63 times
    Karma
    12905950

    Default

    IMO . . . no trade clauses need to be renamed to something else. These aren't no trade clauses, they are player empowerment clauses and teams need to smarten up with them. Honestly, I think they need to be all or nothing - none of this "give us a list crap". Either you waive it or you don't. Depending on the circumstances, a team could desire to bend to the respect of the player, but that should be on a case-by-case basis.
    jerseydevil likes this.

  9. #109
    Frozen Fury JACKPOT!! dgrycan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    10,171
    Liked
    63 times
    Karma
    12905950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vannuxforlife View Post
    yep. And with Ballard hurt Gragnani will have an immediate impact too. Though if recent D acquisitions are any indication he's going to have a tough time with the system at first. That said I think the plan of Ballard-Tanev as the third pairing in the playoffs is still intact.

    As for the trade, call it emotional attachment I suppose, with everyone talking about how this is a good but risky trade for both sides I have a hard time seeing that. I get adding grit to the 2nd line but ultimately the Canucks have been touting how scoring was the issue. Well, Hodgson has helped scoring and helped make a 2nd viable power play unit. Kassian meanwhile might have more upside long term for the team (ultimately where the hell was Hodgson going to be play behind Sedin and Kesler) but I think Vancouver actually shot itself in the foot a bit this season. Unless they somehow make Kassian work for them.
    Look . . . I liked how "Silent G" took a step forward this year, but scoring was not and has not been an issue with the Canucks since his arrival. They scored the most goals in the NHL last season, and have the most this season as well. They basically altered their team from 3 scoring lines to 2 scoring lines, and two checking lines - a system that has been far more successful on the Stanley Cup stage in most recent years. Pahlsson anchors the new checking line, and more importantly, he's kept away from Detroit. Pahlsson knows how to shut-down the Twins in a Series - he's done it before.

    Remember - Kassian has accomplished more at the AHL Level than Cody did, and he's a year younger at this point. And we've all heard how much of a learning curve it takes power forwards to develop. Listening to Gillis today, I get the feeling that Jordan Schroeder in Chicago also might have made this deal a little easier to swallow for the "future". So while I liked Hodgson, I certainly see Kassian as a rarer commodity in the NHL marketplace.

    I didn't think Hodgson was getting moved and wonder if we had openly shopped him if we could've gotten a better deal. Further I'm surprised of the two blue chip prospects it wasn't Schneider that got traded but I think deep down Gillis still isn't sure what to do with him. Draft day deal most likely.
    This deal does put a lot of pressure on Gillis in the off-season - especially if the Canucks don't win a Cup. If they win it, I think they can move Schneider for a more conservative long-term type package involving prospects and picks. If they don't, then no doubt he'll be used to acquire more "prime time" help. And I honestly believe that if they are on this list, they make a strong move for Rick Nash with Schneider being the one thing that other teams really don't have ready to offer.

    Of course, I would offer Luongo first just to see if their stupid enough to bite that hook.

  10. #110
    devenir gris gescom's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    32,019
    Liked
    2136 times
    Karma
    101829081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jt View Post
    Does it matter if the franchise player and team captain's agent threw the team under the bus (by listing the 5 teams) before the team threw the player under the bus?

    And does it matter that the player with the no trade clause demanded a trade in the first place?
    again, i am almost never on the side of a player under these type of circumstances. maybe i have a soft spot for Nash, i don't know. but i personally feel that he has been dogged by this organization since Christ was a corporal - they have done NOTHING to help him help them.... EVER!

    i may be wrong, but the timeline as far as i can remember has been...

    1. realizing trading for Jeff Carter was yet another in a long line of monumental mistakes, it's made known they are looking to move him.

    2. Occupy Nationwide Arena

    3. organization comes out in support of Greg Howson, despite reports of conflicting opinions regarding a complete organizational rebuild.

    4. indicate a willingness to explore a trade involving Rick Nash, to which he and his agent submit the mythical "list" of teams he would accept a trade to - as per HIS right under the conditions of his contract... given to him by the Columbus Blue Jackets.

    5. Jeff Carter is traded.

    6. Nash is becoming increasingly dissatisfied as the clock ticks without resolution... does not get traded by 3:00 PM EST.

    7. Howson holds a Nash specific press conference, at which time - THE FIRST TIME IT IS MENTIONED, he indicated that it was Nash who originally asked to be traded.



    now... this whole idea of a provided list of teams is nothing new. we see it all the time, and i have never seen it unfold like this... with exception to Dany Heatley flat out denying a "completed" trade to Edmonton... which sucked on a different level because the names of the return players got out.

    ... and with regard to that list, there have been so many conflicting reports as to who was or wasn't on it we can probably only cite the Rangers with any certainty, and then make educated guesses about the rest. even Dean Lombardi said Howson never told him either way about the Kings.

    i think it should matter a little that Nash requested to be traded in the first place, considering that it seemingly happened before the idea to move Carter went public, and we heard nary a word about it until AFTER the deadline was over... and in such an unnecessary fashion that loaned itself to the idea that all Howson was doing was sending out a "well f*** you too!" response - in completely poor taste. much like everything else involving Nash and his entire time in Columbus, he has never complained about anything out loud, nor was his trade request made in public.

    what Howson did was wrong, and what he's done to the fans of the Columbus Blue Jackets is even worse.
    Last edited by gescom; February 28th, 2012 at 07:46 AM.
    Kubrick and notbob like this.

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27