Seriously who GAF??? He sucked here and got traded. Is everyone gonna get on Moulson's jock now too? They both sucked here and got traded. Why keep them if they aren't working out? Parse is next if he doesn't get his ish together...
Printable View
Seriously who GAF??? He sucked here and got traded. Is everyone gonna get on Moulson's jock now too? They both sucked here and got traded. Why keep them if they aren't working out? Parse is next if he doesn't get his ish together...
Wtf?!
:24smile:
embarrassing
I won't be making any cynical comments in this thread.
At least not at the present moment. :dancing-smiley:
Well it certainly sounds like your viewpoint is entirely King-centric. Personally, I like to monitor players throughout the entire league. I'm not saying that the Kings should never have traded him; just saying that perhaps that man will realize his dream of being a successful NHL player. So to answer your first question, I give a f***.
Props to you then bro. I'm lumping LGK into the "Hey look at __x__ old kings player who is blowing up right now and we should have never gotten rid of him." I just kinda pisses me off when people do that. Good for them if they succeed after the Kings. Forgive me for lumping you into that stereotype.
Posted via Mobile Device
I don't think many of us actually think that stereotypical way... perhaps just a vocal and whiny minority. Because we watched Boyle struggle and not fit with the Kings, I believe many of us are simply happy that the guy is finding some success in the NHL. Same could be said of following the careers of other guys like Sully, Moulson or Purcell.
There's is one fairly recent Kings player I felt true sadness to see go... Ian Laperriere.
http://cdn.nhl.com/photos/mugs/thumb/8459094.jpg
An empty netter today, but that still counts.
11 goals now. Go Boyle!