Carlyle Fired after win - Boudreau in according to Mackenzie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bollocks

This. IMO there's no way they prevent him from being a head coach for another team. And with Ducks supposedly wanting to save some dollars, what do you think they do when someone wants to take him off their paycheck?

---

Yeah, when there were rumors they weren't making the coaching change because they didn't want to still be paying him to not coach, they'd let him go to save the money.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jom

DL didn't miss on anything...hiring BB would have been a huge mistake. However I think Carlyle should be considered very seriously...

jom

---

The players sure need to be thinking about this. I doubt any of them want to play for a dick like Carlyle...but they might if they don't get their **** together for Murray.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bogey

He signed a contract to be their coach.

If they fired him and filled their coaching position with someone else, how could they stop him from getting another coaching job?

Did Washington have to give Boudreau their blessing?
Link?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bogey

(At the Anaheim Pond)
"Randy, today you're gonna clean up all the toilets on the 1st level.
Here's your brush."

Is that how it works?

They don't have to pay him if he gets a job somewhere else.

Breach of contract?
They already fired him from what he was hired to do.
I don't think he signed an all-purpose contract to do whatever bidding the Anaheim Ducks feel like assigning him to.

Going back to that scenario above, if Carlyle doesn't like doing what they want him to do, he quites. Yes, quites.
It's still a free country, I think.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bollocks

This. IMO there's no way they prevent him from being a head coach for another team. And with Ducks supposedly wanting to save some dollars, what do you think they do when someone wants to take him off their paycheck?

---

You guys know what a contract is, right? It's an agreement between two parties and if it says that I can remove you as coach and still pay you to be my employee then no, you can't go work for someone else. And you can't "quite" a contract and go work for someone else because that would be breach of contract. Where's tortfeasor when you need him?

Still a free country...you crack me up...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KopiFan11

i find it funny that they replaced carlyle with his doppelganger

---

I don't know what you are talking about
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6...2420970d-800wi
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/si/2011/hoc...u-story-ap.jpg

....They aren't the same guy?

Nah! Boudreau has cuter cheeks. :grin:

http://www.thesmokingjacket.com/wp-c...1/boudreau.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jt

You guys know what a contract is, right? It's an agreement between two parties and if it says that I can remove you as coach and still pay you to be my employee then no, you can't go work for someone else.

---

How do you know it says that?
Contracts can be negotiated to say whatever the parties involved decide, within the limits of any bargaining agreement.
Is there a NHLCA (NHL Coaches Association) agreement that states a coach must remain the employee of team as long as the length of the contract?

They may have to pay him as long as the length of the contract, but if he declines to be paid, then where is the breach of contract if he decides to work for someone else?

"Yes, we fired you, but you must sit at home and take our pay and not work for anyone else unless we say so".
Sounds good, for Communist China.

Nice meltdown in Boudreau's Anaheim debut.

Thanks Getzlaf!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bogey

How do you know it says that?
Contracts can be negotiated to say whatever the parties involved decide, within the limits of any bargaining agreement.
Is there a NHLCA (NHL Coaches Association) agreement that states a coach must remain the employee of team as long as the length of the contract?

They may have to pay him as long as the length of the contract, but if he declines to be paid, then where is the breach of contract if he decides to work for someone else?

"Yes, we fired you, but you must sit at home and take our pay and not work for anyone else unless we say so".
Sounds good, for Communist China.

---

Well I haven't seen the contract but since that's the way every single coaching deal has worked in all four major sports since the dawn of coaching contracts...I'm pretty sure that's the way his works. Also, I've heard several interviews this week talking about how Bob Murray went to GMGM to get permission to talk with Boudreau on Monday.

And it works that way in the non-sports world too, but since there are so many industries and jobs, the diversity of contracts is much higher. I've reviewed these kinds of contracts and see non-compete clauses, which is exactly what this is and why teams have to seek permission from the fired coach's team to hire him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bogey

Nice meltdown in Boudreau's Anaheim debut.

Thanks Getzlaf!

---

Getzlaf? What the hell? I thought it was the coach's responsibility to get the players to play well?

It's Boudreau's fault. He has clearly lost the room and his system sucks.

He should be fired and replaced by a better coach.