Well if th econcern is slowin gthe game down and not making it exciting. They could just get rid of the inerference rule and set up wedge plays. Tha would be interesting for a while at least.
Printable View
Well if th econcern is slowin gthe game down and not making it exciting. They could just get rid of the inerference rule and set up wedge plays. Tha would be interesting for a while at least.
Didn't see the game, just the posted clip. I award points for amusing me, and Philly wins that clip for making me laugh.
You clearly see the defense they're employing, so figure out a way to exploit it's weaknesses.
Response: "But it has no weaknesses".
Bull****.
There are no limits to plays that can be run to break through that or any defense.
Like Fishy said, the Flyers just didn't wanna work that hard.
Wahhh!
Nothing that drastic needed. How bout a coach that trusts his players to simply execute a breakout with speed commiting to offense and only chip the puck between the gap of the 3 players at the redline. Instant 2-1 with the ability to cover a high F3 if the chip isnt recovered. There's a strong side and weakside chip opporutnity which doesn't require getting the puck "Deep". Play a 50/50 puck with 2 strong forecheckers and one static dman. I'd take those odds all day long.
This is totally the Flyers' fault. They were on offense and had the puck, meaning they need to attack the Lightning's defensive zone. The Flyers didn't even attempt to make an effort to do so. It doesn't matter what defensive formation the other team has, if you have the puck you attack, plain and simple.