Kovalchuk part V, The NHL Strikes Back, NHLPA files Grievance (All Discussion Here )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by santiclaws

According to the CBA, unless they name one at the beginning of the CBA, there isn't one until they agree; all grievances are to be handled by arbitrators on an ad hoc basis until one is selected. Presumably, there is not one which has been selected so they'll fight about this one for a while. I don't see a procedure for selecting one if the parties do not agree.

EDIT: Section 48 deals with a "successor" System Arbitrator. There is no provision that I see for choosing an arbitrator for grievances if no System Administrator was chosen to begin with.

---

Exactly. The NHL can hold this deal hostage by failing to select an arbitrator. If the NHL stalls until the end of Sept, then even if the arbitrator rules in favor of Kovi, the Devils are strapped trying to get below the CAP in a matter of days. Talk about a fire sale.

The Devils recourse is to renegotiate a deal with Kovi that will be approved by the league while they wait.

If the NHLPA files a grievance, I don't know if Kovi has right to negotiate a new contract with some other team.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by salami

damn you and your quick fingers

---

....that's what she said....
Posted via Mobile Device

God damn auto text.

FYI, Petros and Money will be talking about the story that won't end in a few:

http://www.am570radio.com/main.html

click on listen live.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr. Teeny

I know! Want to play some golf?

---

Sure!!! When?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch

If the NHLPA files a grievance, I don't know if Kovi has right to negotiate a new contract with some other team.

---

I don't think so. If the arbitrator rules against the NHL, then the original contract is still good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LosingSand

In response to the rejected deal, I was fully expecting dean to come out and say:
"we've moved on, there are other options, this is about our kids"

instead it's:
"we would remain interested if the oppurtunity were to present itself"

i get not ruling anything out at this point. But what i'm reading into this is that PLAN B is not looking very good.

---

Nah. I read it as "Plan A is still on the table. He knows our offer, if it comes down to him being a UFA and changing his mind...".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingsfan28

FYI, Petros and Money will be talking about the story that won't end in a few:

AM 570 KLAC K-Los Angeles California/Orange County

click on listen live.

---

Here's a link to a Vancouver station discussing the same thing a lot beter.

TEAM Radio | TEAM 1040 AM | TEAM 1410 AM | Home of Vancouver Canucks and BC Lions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingsfan28

FYI, Petros and Money will be talking about the story that won't end in a few:

AM 570 KLAC K-Los Angeles California/Orange County

click on listen live.

---

No thanks. He has no credibility anymore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingsfan28

FYI, Petros and Money will be talking about the story that won't end in a few:

AM 570 KLAC K-Los Angeles California/Orange County

click on listen live.

---

Dude is clueless. If he was posting this drivel on this site he would get lit up.

Money is wrong, the league would not have shot down the Kings offer, and it's not the same structure as NJ deal, especially the final years.