+1 (I've seen those people, being in the USA is hitting the lottery)
I think I made it pretty clear when I wrote "IK chose NJ/money". How is that not an obvious statement that it IS a business decision? HOWEVER, he STILL made it and it doesn't change the fact that if he REALLY wanted to play for the Kings he could have. He made a CHOICE whether business, personal, geographical, emotional, or otherwise, and it wasn't the Kings. THAT is my point while completely comprehending the fact it was a business decision. Can people wrap their head around that?
Things just got a little... no, a LOT more interesting this morning - stay tuned
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>We all realize that he chose NJ/Money but the statement that you make to qlalify the point "he DIDN'T choose LA" makes it sound more personal to you. IK also did not chose 28 other teams.</p>
<p><font size="1"><i>Posted via Mobile Device</i></font></p>
Let me take a stab at this....
A.) IK's willing to sign a 1 year deal in LA because his wife will be here recording an album, or a TV pilot, or something like that.
2.) The NHL is going back and taking a 2nd look at previous contracts -- Luongo, Pronger, Hossa, et al.
C.) Bobby Ryan offer sheet is on the table.
IV.) DL is set to trade some popcornopulis for players affected by the IK decision.
E.) All of the above.
6.) None of the above.
I'm pretty sure 1 of these will be correct.
My statement was not aimed specifically at you. However, that said, I'm still picking up a vibe that you have an emotional stake in this. You seem to be implying that IK should want to play for the Kings for some reason other than money, i.e. for the honor and glory of playing for the purple. But if I'm wrong about that, then I apologize.