http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3008363
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3009089
Ugh. Not this again.
Printable View
these days, a slugger without his performance enhancing drugs is like a day without sunshine
Is HGH from 2004 really that big of a deal? I understand the issue if they could prove that he's been using it in 2007 but not 2004.
The questions about Bonds are concerning usage from 5-10 years ago also...Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedingPurple
http://www.pedalpushersonline.com/im...king_still.jpg
Everybody cheats. I just didn't know.
-_Sf
But Ankiel wasn't in the Bigs, whereas Bonds was. Hell, Ankiel was hardly in A ball at that time, wasn't he?Quote:
Originally Posted by jbruin152
Edit:
Scratch that, I guess he was in Triple A.
Does it make a difference?Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedingPurple
So do we want to turn this into a black/white issue or an *******/nice guy issue? I have a hunch it won't be ALL OVER the media like Bonds was.Quote:
Originally Posted by jbruin152
;)
:lostit:
:dancingyx:
Shouldn't matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedingPurple
That's not what I meant. I was talking in a "statute of limitations" sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by No One
