Rick (Boston): Darvish or Kershaw? If Kershaw were somehow made a free agent, I don't see anyway he would get anywhere near a $100MM+ contract, so why would a team pay that for Darvish (as Jim Caple has suggested)?
SportsNation Jim Callis: (2:25 PM ET ) If Daisuke Matsuka cost $103.1 million between posting fees and a contract, Darvish could get more. There are people who think he'll be better than Matsuzaka. Kershaw might not get $100 million right now, but 1) he'd get a lot more than you might think and 2) he could get an eight-figure deal when he hits free agency. I'd take Kershaw, perhaps because I have a better feel for him, but Darvish would be close.
Josh (Los Angeles, CA): Any chance Hosmer falls to the Dodgers at 15? Would they spring for him now that the system is mostly bereft of bats, even with their history with Boras?
SportsNation Jim Callis: (2:58 PM ET ) I don't see that marriage happening. I don't know how far Hosmer might fall. I think Alvarez will still find a home near the top of the draft, but I don't know about Hosmer.