Thread: Bust!!!!!

Originally Posted by UberJarhead

You still have Carson Palmer among a field of fairly successful players who may not be all stars, but they're out there. And time will tell on the 09 class. You just simply can't state that USC is full of NFL busts when it's not true.

In the last 10 years, yes it is. You wanna compare them to Miami talent? Okay this is how you stack up the NFL with fkn talent(off the top of my head and recent, not going back to 70's and 80's like you did)

Reggie Wayne
Andre Johnson
Santana Moss
Frank Gore
Clinton Portis
Willis Mcgahee
Edgerin James
Ray Lewis
Sean Taylor
Ed Reed
Dan Morgan
Antrell Rolle
Jeremy Shockey
Kellen Winslow Jr
Jonathon Vilma
DJ Williams


A few not so great but still usable honorable mentions

Phillip Buchanon
Najeh Davenport


off the top of my head, I'm sure Cane fans can add to this list. USC doesn't even compare to that list.

Originally Posted by UberJarhead

Don't get ugly and personal about it. Can YOU read? I said I was having an issue posting, so simmer down.

How backwards do you have to be? Your team can barely put out a starter in the NFL and you're bragging because Bush and Lienart aren't the hottest players in the league?

Like I said, compare them to other top Football schools not to a basketball school. I brought up UCLA cause MJD is probably a better player than any offensive USC player in the nfl currently, not cause I give a damn about UCLA.

Originally Posted by KingsFan4Ever

In the last 10 years, yes it is. You wanna compare them to Miami talent? Okay this is how you stack up the NFL with fkn talent(off the top of my head and recent, not going back to 70's and 80's like you did)

Reggie Wayne
Andre Johnson
Santana Moss
Frank Gore
Clinton Portis
Willis Mcgahee
Edgerin James
Ray Lewis
Sean Taylor
Ed Reed
Dan Morgan
Antrell Rolle
Jeremy Shockey
Kellen Winslow Jr
Jonathon Vilma
DJ Williams


A few not so great but still usable honorable mentions

Phillip Buchanon
Najeh Davenport


off the top of my head, I'm sure Cane fans can add to this list. USC doesn't even compare to that list.

So, are you a Miami fan? Is that what I'm missing? Because that's the only way I can understand why you should give a ****. Honestly. I never said they had the most or the best in the league. But if you're only going to name me a handful of schools that have better, then I'm pretty okay with that. If you haven't noticed, I don't usually base my favorite teams on success.

Edit: Compare them to whatever effing team you want man. I really don't give half the **** about this that you do.

Originally Posted by UberJarhead

So, are you a Miami fan? Is that what I'm missing? Because that's the only way I can understand why you should give a ****. Honestly. I never said they had the most or the best in the league. But if you're only going to name me a handful of schools that have better, then I'm pretty okay with that. If you haven't noticed, I don't usually base my favorite teams on success.

USC has an usual high BUST rate compared to other schools. Specially when it comes to the offensive players. That's what I'm saying and all these USC nuthuggers can deal with it. No I'm not a Canes fan, I just hate when USC fans think they produce the best NFL talent when they aren't even top 5.

Originally Posted by KingsFan4Ever

USC has an usual high BUST rate compared to other schools. Specially when it comes to the offensive players. That's what I'm saying and all these USC nuthuggers can deal with it. No I'm not a Canes fan, I just hate when USC fans think they produce the best NFL talent when they aren't even top 5.

You may note that this thread was started by an apparently bitter Bruins fan, not a USC fan. Call USC fans what you want, but generally, this type of venom is started and spewed by haters. Pure and simple.

May I ask... what is your college team?

Originally Posted by UberJarhead

You may note that this thread was started by an apparently bitter Bruins fan, not a USC fan. Call USC fans what you want, but generally, this type of venom is started and spewed by haters. Pure and simple.

May I ask... what is your college team?

Since my college didn't have a football team I'd say none. I don't like associating myself with a team when I didn't attend the school. I love watching college football and fake USC fans that don't no much more then "go trojans" piss me off. So yeah I rather have UCLA succeed. I know a few real USC fans who are more realistic and went to that school. My least favorite USC fans are the ones that claim LA needs no NFL team because USC is LA's team, UGHH NO.

Originally Posted by KingsFan4Ever

Since my college didn't have a football team I'd say none. I don't like associating myself with a team when I didn't attend the school. I love watching college football and fake USC fans that don't no much more then "go trojans" piss me off. So yeah I rather have UCLA succeed. I know a few real USC fans who are more realistic and went to that school. My least favorite USC fans are the ones that claim LA needs no NFL team because USC is LA's team, UGHH NO.

I don't understand why it's only ever been UCLA fans or people who "would rather see UCLA succeed" say that you have to have, or at least should have gone to the college to cheer for them. I really don't. And what does it matter who people cheer for, honestly? Or how many all star players or even starting players a college has sent to the NFL? Is this purely because they can't attack the on field product?

Like the Sooners fan... LMMFAO... when you get a coach who doesn't choke in the big game let me know. Holy **** how many bowl games can you guys blow? OU Bowl History - Oklahoma Sooners Football Who didn't know they were going to run to the left?

USC on field producut? Easy, chokefest101. Stanford, Oregon St, etc etc, every year guaranteed. Followed by beating up a much less talented BIG 10 team in Rose Bowl. For USC sake college needs playoffs.

Originally Posted by KingsFan4Ever

USC on field producut? Easy, chokefest101. Stanford, Oregon St, etc etc, every year guaranteed. Followed by beating up a much less talented BIG 10 team in Rose Bowl. For USC sake college needs playoffs.

I promise you that I was more critical of that team than anyone who isn't a fan. I honestly didn't think they deserved a bowl when they lost to Stanford, I knew they didn't deserve a shot at the Championship when they lost to Oregon State, and I don't consider the year LSU won the National Championship as a shared one. However, isn't almost every game won by the more talented team? Was Penn State really that much less talented? Michigan the year the Trojans beat them in the Rose Bowl? I'll give you Illinois, but remember, that year Illinois was winning games they really had no business winning.

USC 31-15 in bowl games.
Miami 15-11
Ohio State 18-22
Oklahoma 24-17-1
Michigan 19-20
Nebraska 23-22
Tennessee 25-22
Penn State 23-12-2
Texas 25-21-2
Florida 17-19
Michigan State 19-20

Those are the teams who are close to USC in putting players in the NFL. For the rest of the Pac-10

UCLA 13-15-1
Arizona 6-7-1
Arizona State 10-8-1
Washington 14-14-1
Washington State 6-4
Stanford 9-10-1
Oregon 9-13
Oregon State 8-4
Cal 9-8-1