Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    One Marmot, Two Cups darby's Avatar




    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    11,821
    Liked
    501 times
    Karma
    1094400
    Images
    5
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    166 Post(s)

    Default The ESPN QBR Rating

    It's supposed to take into account all kinds of statistical information and weight it based on importance of the play and stuff like that. It doesn't counts yards after the catch or interceptions from dropped or friendly tips and it accounts for QB rushing yards. It weights plays in the fourth quarter when your team is behind.


    It sounds like a complicated, subjective, after-the-fact load to me. Anyone else have an opinion?


    "Only a numbskull thinks he knows things about things he knows nothing about."
    "It's understanding that makes it possible for people like us to tolerate a person like yourself."

  2. #2
    King Of The Guillotine KingsOvAllKings's Avatar




    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    350
    Liked
    79 times
    Karma
    1000000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    13 Post(s)

    Default

    I thought it would be cool because i assumed you might be able to compare this new rating to older player's stats simply by looking at older box scores but allot of it is based off of situation specific plays correct? Depending on when during the game a play was executed, the score? Some of these might only be comparable to older players via film. Im not too sold on it i like the idea of fumbles becoming a part of the rating though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65