Agreed.
Should Daniel Briere be able to destroy Zdeno Chara with a check just because it happens along the boards? You know it shouldn't normally be possible unless Chara hit a rut or their legs got tangled up.
I sometimes have trouble with the red circle when I hit the redline and dump the puck into the offensive zone for a change. The camera follows the puck and now I can't see where my own bench is so I have to resort to blindly rubbing myself along the boards until I eventually find it or wait until the camera pans back up.
It makes sense if you take a real world view on the matter.
Some players get mentioned as a good locker room presence that makes the players around them play a little looser and with more confidence. It gets talked about a lot and the impact a player like that can have to a team isn't limited to whether they're playing on your line or not. Conversely an incompatible player might become a locker room cancer and be a negative distraction.
There might be a grinder on your 4th line who is decent, but not really all that great. You could find a better skilled player, but from the standpoint of chemistry he adds a heck of a lot to your team. Is it worth it to replace him?
I'm sort of advocating the placement of value to players that might not necessarily be dependent just on the skill points they have in certain stats. Currently the game boils down to a contest of hoarding guys with the highest rating, and while that's fine and dandy it's very fake.
Edit: Player acquisitions in general should have a plus or minus associated with it. If I get a legit superstar perhaps there should be a boost to the team morale. If I make too many trades maybe the team is freaked out because they think they're next. I don't know, maybe it's too realistic...


