November 21st, 2010, 01:24 AM #381
November 21st, 2010, 01:31 AM #382
November 21st, 2010, 01:43 AM #383
November 21st, 2010, 08:20 AM #384
See, this is why chicks shouldn't be near computers. Too emotional. A toaster oven or a microwave should be the most advanced piece of modern technology they should attempt to use...although the microwave is really pushing it.
You guys are ****ing up you're own thread!
November 21st, 2010, 08:30 AM #385
I mean look at Shab. That guy came on here, posted epic booby pics and deservingly became a LGK icon! I dont remember him posting anything other than boobies and obscure stuff and he's still revered as the king of the interwebs amongst us dudes so...try chill.
November 21st, 2010, 08:34 AM #386
C'mon, now. Do you see the guys on here complaining to each other that they are promoting some awful male stereotype when they post pictures of half naked women? No. Why? Because guys don't give a crap if women think they're pigs. So why should we bust on each other for posting on this thread. I am no puckbunny, but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy looking at pictures of some fine male specimens. Chill out, relax and enjoy this for what it is...just fun.
Now....more pictures, please.
November 21st, 2010, 11:25 AM #387
Actually we can't post half naked pics of women, not nearly as much as a lot of message boards. There are very clear rules about this.
Originally Posted by pug
For the record, I am a pig but if I want sexy pics and video's I don't come to a hockey site. I go to places where their entire existence is tied to pics of girls.
I also don't want the ice girls on the ice at all, and I've taken that stance many times. The ice should be cleaned by local hockey teams trying to raise money. To some of the guys that makes me homosexual, if that's the case then lets hit up WeHo.
There is just a bunch of puckbunny love going on here and you don't like it, stop doing it. It's a personal choice.
November 21st, 2010, 12:18 PM #388
i'm terribly confused.
you see, here i thought the term "puck bunny" was reserved for those chicks who appreciate hockey largely because of the men and who don't really care or understand what's going on in the game. i even thought it referred to those who endeavored to find these players and bed them.
i had no idea it referred to women who love and understand (and in some cases play) hockey. i had no idea it referred to women who are contributing members to an incredibly passionate online community dedicated to discussing the la kings.
look, what i'm seeing is (and it's not surprising) a clear and offensive double standard. the guys are free to enjoy their hockey and enjoy their eye candy as they see fit (ok, except you tonga, because you don't s* where you eat) but the second the ladies endeavor to step away (even slightly, we've been very mild in here) from pure hockey talk, it's this major catastrophe. what i'm seeing is "guys enjoy yourselves and make yourselves at home" when we woman are enjoying no such invitation.
November 21st, 2010, 01:16 PM #389
internetz, serious business
November 21st, 2010, 01:37 PM #390
rcc, I agree with you on the puckbunny definition. Ladies who understand hockey and love the game are great. Those who don't have a clue and are just in it to be groupies, I have no use for.
That aside, this thread has far too much seriousness. So you can all feel free to thank me later.
I'm sure this is quite popular in Slovakia.
Last edited by mitchrock; November 21st, 2010 at 02:37 PM.
Tags for this Thread