Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Hawks Broken Beyond Repair?

  1. #21
    \_(ツ)_/
    Krussadams's Avatar
    Karma: 15640022
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,582
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    614 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NobleSavage View Post
    I guess we will see in the next 18 months or so. A NMC is great and all, but when your GM approaches you and says he wants to ship your ass out for lack of production (or something more pc and mild) I'm guessing you might think about waiving that perk.
    Also, I see more perceived value up and down the Blackhawks roster as opposed to the Kings.
    Time will tell.
    For both teams, for sure. I don't argue that DL handed out some contracts that he really shouldn't have, but I just see the virtual lack of NMCs as at least a little light at the end of the tunnel.

    Sure, it would probably be a real pain in the ass to move the likes of Gaborik, but if a deal can be done, there's no NMC obstacle there. Hossa could be easier to move, but not if he won't waive. A GM can threaten to move him for lack of production, but that NMC gives the player the final say, and IMO, the upper hand.

    Like I said, I wish DL would have done things differently. But he at least didn't hand out NMCs like candy. The next couple seasons will tell...and should be interesting. For both teams.
    "Bob Miller did a great job for the Kings for over a number of years." -Daryl Evans, March 23, 2017.

  2. #22
    Bring on Vancouver!
    USCKingsFan31's Avatar
    Karma: 8665960
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,260
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1177 Post(s)

    Default

    The point of this thread wasn't really to point out that the Blackhawks are broken beyond repair. They aren't. I don't believe that the Kings are, either.

    The point was to show how much of a difference perception makes. Plenty of you are happy to jump to a bunch of conclusions to defend the Hawks, while on the other hand jumping to a bunch of conclusions in the other direction to put the Kings down.

    It's annoying. The reality is, variance/luck plays a huge role in sports, especially in a statistically tiny period of time like 3-5 seasons. My argument is simply that you can't have it both ways. If a couple of bad seasons in a row = KINGS ARE DONE FOREVER, then apply that rule to everyone. It makes no sense to nitpick positive aspects of the Hawks (and others) while ignoring positive aspects of the Kings. Be consistent.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •