Reg or Rog?
Prospect
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2017
- Messages
- 2,620
- LGKash:
- $500.00
Wow...already an eventful day. I cannot imagine a scenario where Seattle doesn't take him. Then, again, this will apparently be a day full of surprises.
Here's where i feel like, unless LA is close on something solid, they should have at least sent a lwo pick for him. I get it, it forces us to expose someone else, but man... If we wind up protecting Brown.
How long before Seattle can flip him and eat half the cap hit? January?
Here's where i feel like, unless LA is close on something solid, they should have at least sent a lwo pick for him. I get it, it forces us to expose someone else, but man... If we wind up protecting Brown.
I assume they would not have left him unprotected if they could have gotten anything for him. I guess they did not want to retain salary and couldn't get a trade done without doing so.Perhaps it just shows that Tarasenko doesn't have the value in today's market that we may think he has. I read an article yesterday which stated Tarasenko identified 10 teams he would be willing to be traded to and the Kings were not on the list.
Judging by Philadelphia and others there may be some pretty good gambles with high dollar contracts exposed so Seattle definitely will have options.
I assume they would not have left him unprotected if they could have gotten anything for him. I guess they did not want to retain salary and couldn't get a trade done without doing so.
Probably to no one's surprised I'm not in the least bit interested in this guy playing for the Kings. I haven't a clue what this all means but Seattle can have him for all I care.
jom
Landeskog has apparently been left exposed as well. Price in Montreal too.
Armstrong has told Tarasenko’s camp, according to a source, that no teams are interested in the player, who has scored 30-plus goals in five of his nine NHL seasons but has since had three shoulder operations. The source added that Los Angeles, New Jersey, Carolina and Boston, among other teams, have each expressed interest and were willing to take on Tarasenko’s $7.5 million salary-cap hit for the next two seasons, but Armstrong has not found a suitable return.
How long before Seattle can flip him and eat half the cap hit? January?
Probably to no one's surprised I'm not in the least bit interested in this guy playing for the Kings. I haven't a clue what this all means but Seattle can have him for all I care.
jom
https://theathletic.com/2712778/202...sion-draft-sources/?source=emp_shared_article
This makes no sense. They were not offered enough but are willing to let the Kraken take him for nothing?
Same article says that at this point he's willing to go anywhere, he just wants out.I'd take Vladi in a heartbeat, but it's academic since he's
evidently not interested in coming to Los Angeles.
Same article says that at this point he's willing to go anywhere, he just wants out.
![]()
But seriously, with my connection to St. Louis and all my hockey friends there, I've watched quite a few Blues games over the years...and I've probably seen the Blues play in LA more than any other team...and I've seen Tarasenko play many times. The guy can put the puck in the back of the net.
Yes, I'm very well aware of the shoulder issues, but as I mentioned in previous threads, I've overcome many types of shoulder injuries over the years. And yes, it's a complicated joint that takes time to heal...but it can heal and be 100%. That I know for a fact.
The Kings need scorers. That's also a fact.
The biggest complaint I've heard over the years from Blues fans is Vladi didn't give 100% in every game. Sometimes a change of scenery is all it takes to reinvigorate, reenergize and re-motivate a player. It happens all the time. And I don't blame him for wanting out of Missouri. It sucks.
If the Kraken don't take him, I certainly hope the Kings at least try.