- Joined
- Apr 5, 2002
- Messages
- 17,439
- LGKash:
- $500.00
I don't have a subscription, but Jeff Skinner has to have the worst contract in the NHL.
Drew is overpaid, but not by that much based on where the market is nowadays.
Would love to see at least the relevant details for drew posted here. I find it hard to believe his contract is the worst in the NHL
considering how bad some of those other contracts are.
On a poor Kings team, Doughty had a below-average expected goal and actual share again, but he managed to reverse an ugly trend where he was below average relative to the team too. This time he was positive, the Kings’ best defender. Coupled with a 50-point pace, Doughty was worth about 1.3 wins per 82 last season. Not bad, and it’s clear he isn’t cooked just yet.
The problem is that the expectation at $11 million is significantly higher than “top pair caliber.” The expectation is elite level play, roughly 2.6 wins on average through the life of the deal. That’s twice as good as Doughty’s return-to-form season. It’s an extremely high bar to clear, one prime Doughty could, but 31-year-old Doughty likely can’t. It’ll be an even bigger problem for 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36-year-old Doughty and that’s the main reason Doughty is here again at the top of this list.
A couple of charts and some of the reasoning from the article:
Thanks. If we offered up Drew straight 1 for 1 with no retention, Buffalo would agree to trade Skinner and the Sharks would agree to trade Karlsson in a heartbeat. Hell, San Jose might also be willing to swap Drew for Couture, Vlasic, Kane or Burns too.
(My point being that he has nowhere near the worst contract in the league.)
I bet half those guys didn't even play against Doughty last season. NHL players are just as susceptible to bias and memories of what someone once was, and if you needed any evidence, him being rated the best in 2019-20 is all the evidence you need . He was a ****ing disaster in 19-20. He was a little better last season, but he's not half the player he used to be, and that's without looking at stats. That's just having ownership of ****ing eyeballs.I just posted this in another thread...
I find it HILARIOUS that analytic nerds say Doughty's contract is THE worst in the NHL, while ACTUAL NHL PLAYERS rated him 4th best D last season and THE BEST D in 2019-20.
I bet half those guys didn't even play against Doughty last season. NHL players are just as susceptible to bias and memories of what someone once was, and if you needed any evidence, him being rated the best in 2019-20 is all the evidence you need . He was a ****ing disaster in 19-20. He was a little better last season, but he's not half the player he used to be, and that's without looking at stats. That's just having ownership of ****ing eyeballs.
I don't.I love the analytic nerds, but I trust actual NHLers over analytic nerds.
I don't.
First of all, you are ignoring what I said - they were going by reputation and not necessarily what they personally observed recently, especially since I guarantee that many of the voting players did not even play against Doughty last season. Second, NHL players, when elevated to GM and coach positions, have repeatedly proven that many of them have no clue whatsoever regarding what makes a good NHL player. Third, I don't believe in the eye test, except as a very crude measure of a player, regardless of who administers the eye test. That includes NHL players and professional scouts. Analytics have become important for a reason. The primary reason being that people whose job it was to evaluate players weren't very good at it.Seriously? You think actual NHL players don't know what makes for a good NHL player? Or are you talking about fantasy hockey? Because if you really do believe that actual NHL people don't know what makes for a good NHL player, I don't even know what to say.
First of all, you are ignoring what I said - they were going by reputation and not necessarily what they personally observed recently, especially since I guarantee that many of the voting players did not even play against Doughty last season. Second, NHL players, when elevated to GM and coach positions, have repeatedly proven that many of them have no clue whatsoever regarding what makes a good NHL player. Third, I don't believe in the eye test, except as a very crude measure of a player, regardless of who administers the eye test. That includes NHL players and professional scouts. Analytics have become important for a reason. The primary reason being that people whose job it was to evaluate players weren't very good at it.
Again, these are the same players who voted Doughty the best defenseman in the NHL in 2019-20, when he was, by any measure including said eye test, a disaster. If you think they were right and he really was the best defenseman in the NHL, then I don't know what to say.
He was a ****ing disaster in 19-20. He was a little better last season, but he's not half the player he used to be, and that's without looking at stats.