***DSLR/Photography MegaThread***

Yeah, it made me jealous of those D3 owners. ;)

I need to get out and start playing with the AEB and do some work on the HDR skills. Not sure when I'll have time.

I played around with the AEB a little bit at the Arboretum the other day. The nice thing about the D3 is that it will shoot so fast that you can do hand-held three exposure bracketed bursts with relative ease as long as the scene is fairly bright and your slowest shutter speed is faster than about 1/100th. Nine frames-per-second has its advantages!
 
Hand held works fine for me ;)

I gotta get out and take some pics now that I'm feeling better.

I got a deal on a wide angle on ebay the other day so that might be good for HDR to make it even more "other worldly".
 
I need to get out and start playing with the AEB and do some work on the HDR skills. Not sure when I'll have time.

I played around with the AEB a little bit at the Arboretum the other day. The nice thing about the D3 is that it will shoot so fast that you can do hand-held three exposure bracketed bursts with relative ease as long as the scene is fairly bright and your slowest shutter speed is faster than about 1/100th. Nine frames-per-second has its advantages!

That chart is great. I had no idea that Nikon went 2-9 AEB all the way down to the D200. Very cool!
 
Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 EF-S USM

So all three of my lenses are 77mm. How lucky is that?
 
Here's a couple from the Getty today. I went to play around with the 14mm f/2.8 and to work on some architectural shooting skills. Believe it or not, there is virtually no color saturation increase in the post-prod of these captures. I metered on the sky to get it to be so blue.

2404377394_8f24f948c9.jpg


2404378508_5276c82ef9.jpg


2403550207_fea96bfc66.jpg


2403560819_7c8aef92c7.jpg


The rest are here.

I've got some HDR work to do, as well.
 
Okay. As some of you may have seen, I played around for a little while at the Getty Center today. I shot a couple bracketed scenes so that I could play around with Photomatix when I got back home.

Here's what I came up with. I'm kinda happy with the way these turned out, though I still need some practice. I tried to remember the Zone System when looking at scenes, and that really did help a lot.

I've linked below the HDRs to the images that are the median exposure in the five-shot bracket.

2403670141_9e0e8ba581.jpg

Median Exposure

2403669677_ef9073e27c.jpg

Median Exposure

2403668829_0af8ef260f.jpg

Median Exposure

2403669333_a7fffd9f5d.jpg

Median Exposure

After I got them looking the way I wanted them to look in Photomatix, I tweaked them a bit in Photoshop for brightness, contrast, dust spots, noise, and sharpness.
 
Last edited:
God that 14mm f/2.8 is nice! Canon needs to get their stuff together. They have the same lens, but for about $800 more, and probably not quite as nice.

Excellent shots, the HDRs are fantastic as well. Nicely done. I promise you guys I will photograph something besides BabyFan in the near future to share :)

SamPage_20080401_7793.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FBJ
God that 14mm f/2.8 is nice! Canon needs to get their stuff together. They have the same lens, but for about $800 more, and probably not quite as nice.

Excellent shots, the HDRs are fantastic as well. Nicely done.

Thanks. I really do like that 14mm lens. It's GREAT for architectural photography! Getting it used saved me some dough, but Adorama's rating system is debatable. The website said it was E (shows normal wear, might have minor scratches, glass clean), but there is a definite ding in the glass. It's minuscule in size, of course, but its noticeable in images. I think it should have been rated at G at best. Fortunately, its easy to take out with the spot-removal tool in Lightroom.

Still better than spending $400 more, I think.
 
1 and 2 are superb! I love them. 3 is close, but I think the varying tonality in the sky is a little distracting to me (where going left to right starting at the sun it goes sun, bright patch, dark patch, light patch, wall, lighter patch). Fantastic.
 
the 10-22 arrived. I took it on the dog walk and snapped this pic of the neighbor's flowers


flowers.jpg
 
the 10-22 arrived. I took it on the dog walk and snapped this pic of the neighbor's flowers

I'll be very currious to hear what you think of it IQ wise compared to the 17-55, as it is the first new Canon UWA in a while. Looks good so far!
 
pier.jpg


This lens has some smudges in the sky area up there. I guess it's fixible if I really had to but I noticed it in a few other shots too. It looks perfect to the eye but I guess there are some little flaws or my polarizer was dirty.
 
So those imperfections on the 10-22 are too much to take and I even cleaned the lens so I am gonna have to try and return the thing now. What a pain.
 
Back
Top