certainly this stuff is all relative. We're talking about the best guys in the world, so even guys that are not fast, or dont have a great shot, or aren't good skaters... that's all within the context of world's best hockey players.
But even within the top 1000 guys in the world, you can see a huge difference between a guy like 97, and a guy on the 4th line. And that stuff matters at this level. Im just surprised that Stoll would say that certain skills are difficult to noticeably improve by this point, and then turn around and know that the Kings do draft guys with defects in their game in these very specific skills. Like, if i thought skating was extremely difficult to improve, then that's a red flag id avoid in my draft. Obviously Stoll is just one guy, and he likely doesn't have the same level of pull when it come sto drafting players, but i found it an interesting comment.