VCRW
Classic player
Exactly. Malott is an AHL-er. And Turc is wasted on Line 4. And Armia does not belong with Kopi and Juice.Barely so.
I’d prefer to see Malott sit and Turc move up to the Kopi-Kempe line. Helenius between Perry and Armia.
Exactly. Malott is an AHL-er. And Turc is wasted on Line 4. And Armia does not belong with Kopi and Juice.Barely so.
I’d prefer to see Malott sit and Turc move up to the Kopi-Kempe line. Helenius between Perry and Armia.
I need you to analyze the last 10 seasons of play, and show me how it would or wouldn’t have made a difference. Pretty graphs too.321 doesn't really have that much of an impact, it's the loser point that does the most
I'm nearly positive there's an analytics guy that does this annually, almost none of the changes end up making big differences in the standings overall. I personally would rather go back to ties and no OT. Second choice would be 3-3 OT but with a blue line back court rule. Third choice would be how they have it now because they could always make it worse.I need you to analyze the last 10 seasons of play, and show me how it would or wouldn’t have made a difference. Pretty graphs too.
You know the spreadsheet guru in you wants to do it Jammer. It would be a great Holiday project when it’s way too cold to go outside.
Not just the opposition but it is also killing us viewers! It is so incredibly boring to look at Kings games at the moment, even when they win. BORING!!!!!The Kings game plan of boring the opposition to death seems to be working.
I was half asleep so I didn't notice but are they back to the 1-3-1?The Kings were more boring than usual. Just a waste of time.
I'm nearly positive there's an analytics guy that does this annually, almost none of the changes end up making big differences in the standings overall. I personally would rather go back to ties and no OT. Second choice would be 3-3 OT but with a blue line back court rule. Third choice would be how they have it now because they could always make it worse.
He's much better. Helenius has no positive features except for his size.At this point is Danault any better than Helenius would be?
Already?
You can’t have this lack of production from even a defense-first third line. Danault has 4 assists and no goals in 20 games. That’s a kind of cratering.He's much better. Helenius has no positive features except for his size.
Danault has been very good for years and was one of our stronger playoff performers. I don't think his game has cratered in 4 months time.
I'm with you, though he has struggled this season. That said, there's no reason to think he won't rebound (as he did last season during the playoffs).He's much better. Helenius has no positive features except for his size.
Danault has been very good for years and was one of our stronger playoff performers. I don't think his game has cratered in 4 months time.