Was it Clarke? Dumoulin? Thought it was “22” on the jersey. Happy to admit I was wrong. And I guess Kevin has already contributed enough to the Canes.It wasn't. Idk what game you're watching.
Edited the earlier one. It was Dumoulin. He'd turned it over. Back-checked and stole from Aho and then dumped it straight onto a Canes stick while changing. So Clarke had to attempt to dive back to break up the play. But that sequence was #2 crapping all over the place.Was it Clarke? Dumoulin? Thought it was “22” on the jersey. I guess Kevin has already contributed enough to the Canes.
Of course it matters if another left shot d’man should go down. I guess one would assume it would be Bolduc. Size. Decent offense. +8. Doughty would get Dumoulin as a partner and Mo would play with Ceci.
I don’t understand your ridicule. It was a legitimate question. While I have been paying attention to the forwards in Ontario, I have far less knowledge about the defensemen. Please spare me your condescending attitude. Thank you.Lol, and what if a right shot D goes down? Doughty is due to be out again for a spell.
If Anderson is not out long term they may not bring up anyone. A homestand is coming up and then the Olympic break. The 2 D that make the most sense to bring up (nhl ready) are waiver exempt. Why risk losing one of them if/when they get sent back down.
This is why I like youHarrold.
![]()
![]()
I don’t understand your ridicule. It was a legitimate question. While I have been paying attention to the forwards in Ontario, I have far less knowledge about the defensemen. Please spare me your condescending attitude. Thank you.
I think they just play Mo and hope nobody gets hurt. There's only 2 games until the break. One at home so no reason to make a move and then a quick trip to Vegas.Lol, and what if a right shot D goes down? Doughty is due to be out again for a spell.
If Anderson is not out long term they may not bring up anyone. A homestand is coming up and then the Olympic break. The 2 D that make the most sense to bring up (nhl ready) are waiver exempt. Why risk losing one of them if/when they get sent back down.
I don’t understand your ridicule. It was a legitimate question. While I have been paying attention to the forwards in Ontario, I have far less knowledge about the defensemen. Please spare me your condescending attitude. Thank you.
I wasn’t “going off” on anyone in this conversation. I simply asked who would be the most likely guy in Ontario to get a call up. That should not have generated anything like the crap that was replied.I mean you are kinda going off on the Kings a bit too hard IMO.
It can be irking but I am just finding it humorous
Adding the “but” contradicts the “Sorry”. C’mon. I only hoped for someone to give an intelligent response about the available defensemen in Ontario.Sorry for any misunderstanding, but..........
Canucks fansHaving been a fan since the early '70s, I find it difficult to admit this, but I prefer watching almost any other team in the league over this current iteration of the Kings. It is just embarrassing how inept they are this season. Who would pay money for this monkey show?