Science!!!

Space X successfully lands rocket on an ocean barge

[video]http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/tech/nasa-spacex-launch-experiments-space-station-irpt/index.html[/video]
 
So theres another emdrive article up on yahoo

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/explaining-emdrive-physics-defying-thruster-162741826.html

One thing i want to point out is all the dancing about peer reviewed information has been lacking. Its a dirty portion of the scientific world that the process of peer review can be strickingly political.
Basically all journals have an editorial board made up of scientists and engineers, any publisher worth his salt is going to run a quick pass to their contact to be sure the journal would be interested in sending their article out for review. This is where it gets sticky, no board is made up of altrustic guardians of true science, they are made up of fellow professors or program managers who are all vested in seeing their versions of whatever field they represent advance. They are not the least bit interested in revolutionizing a new field based on science they cannot build on and most certainly don't want to take the time to understand. Remember folks publishing are pushing the boundaries of most things and even things that are very close to a layman are distinctly different in the view of how a lab could reproduce the work. Nobody is going to reproduce the original work to verify it, they are going to reproduce it because they have an idea on how to take the original idea and do something else with it. Effectively what happens is there needs to be enough money floating around a concept that multiple labs chase the idea creating the peer review community, or you are going to have the equivalent of a jet mechanic reviewing how you think its better to drive a submarine by penguin **** and they quite frankly cant be bothered and they certainly dont want people getting excited enough to stop offering dollars for jet research and instead allocating some money into penguin **** or submarines.
 
Back
Top