Science!!!

"Pale Blue Dot" redux, remastered.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/nasa-re-masters-the-greatest-ever-selfie/ar-BB104jjQ?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=hplocalnews


BBZXJKG.img
 
?You are your safest sex partner,? the B.C. CDC says. ?Masturbating by yourself (solo sex) will not spread COVID-19.?

But will it still make you go blind? :think:
 
It should be noted that is an opinion piece, and does not at all reflect the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine. Phrases such as "completely successful use" should be an immediate tell that it is not a serious endeavor. The author's citation of "natural experiments" in with no control groups or evidence to establish facts of causation seems dubious and error prone. Further, the author doesn't cite the reference for claims such as "[hydroxychloroquine] has demonstrated significant benefit in large hospital studies." Finally, Dr. Risch never acknowledges in the article his past advisory consulting work with two manufacturers of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and doxycycline, which is problematic.


Conclusions to a study should read something like this:
METHODS
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States and parts of Canada testing hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis. We enrolled adults who had household or occupational exposure to someone with confirmed Covid-19 at a distance of less than 6 ft for more than 10 minutes while wearing neither a face mask nor an eye shield (high-risk exposure) or while wearing a face mask but no eye shield (moderate-risk exposure). Within 4 days after exposure, we randomly assigned participants to receive either placebo or hydroxychloroquine (800 mg once, followed by 600 mg in 6 to 8 hours, then 600 mg daily for 4 additional days). The primary outcome was the incidence of either laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 or illness compatible with Covid-19 within 14 days.

RESULTS
We enrolled 821 asymptomatic participants. Overall, 87.6% of the participants (719 of 821) reported a high-risk exposure to a confirmed Covid-19 contact. The incidence of new illness compatible with Covid-19 did not differ significantly between participants receiving hydroxychloroquine (49 of 414 [11.8%]) and those receiving placebo (58 of 407 [14.3%]); the absolute difference was −2.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval, −7.0 to 2.2; P=0.35). Side effects were more common with hydroxychloroquine than with placebo (40.1% vs. 16.8%), but no serious adverse reactions were reported.

CONCLUSIONS
After high-risk or moderate-risk exposure to Covid-19, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection when used as postexposure prophylaxis within 4 days after exposure. (Funded by David Baszucki and Jan Ellison Baszucki and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04308668. opens in new tab.)
 
Going down a very weird rabbit hole, seems people launched a study on TB vaccine boosters right at the start of the pandemic to see if it would help the elderly, trying to find the actual results which were supposed to be published in the journal Cell


https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...e-steel-immune-system-against-new-coronavirus

There's a wsj editorial that references it and claims it was almost 80% effective... But I want to see the actual study.
 
Back
Top Bottom