Science!!!

Some interesting Psychology here:

Why Do We Judge Parents For Putting Kids At Perceived — But Unreal — Risk?

It takes some effort to neglect the social commentary and realize the science here shows quite a lot about how perceptions can instantly color a situation to your disadvantage (or advantage).

I did not read the whole piece, will do do later, so perhaps this was mentioned...

I think part of the reason society is so judgemental over this is that in this day and age you hear about every bad incident involving a child due to the 24 hour news cycle and the internet. As the article pointed out violent crime has gone down since the 70's but since we get bombarded 24/7 with stories of crime, especially against kids, it seems that today is way more violent than back then. Back then you might only hear a local story of a crime against a kid or one that happened elsewhere if it was especially horrific. And if you did not watch the news that night, you perhaps missed the story and therefore were never aware of the incident, where today you can't avoid such a story unless you live in a cave.

And I have to admit, I am aware of this but I still don't let my girls walk to school alone even though it is only a couple block away. I know that it safer today than when me and my siblings walked to school but I still cannot let my kids do it, when I start to think about letting them walk by themselves some story pops up about some weirdo trying to grab a kid off the street. And even though that could have happened in Vermont it still affects me. I tell my self "It may a one in 5 million chance that something happens to a kid walking to school but knowing my luck I'll be the one in five million!"

So even though I logically am aware that they are safer now than I was as a kid, emotionally I just can't do it.

So sometimes our technological news era sucks.
 
Some interesting Psychology here:

Why Do We Judge Parents For Putting Kids At Perceived — But Unreal — Risk?

It takes some effort to neglect the social commentary and realize the science here shows quite a lot about how perceptions can instantly color a situation to your disadvantage (or advantage).


It's an interesting experiment, but not surprising.

I wish cognitive bias was a concept I'd been introduced to much earlier, but I did not read about such a thing until reading the book Thinking, Fast and Slow several years ago. The examples from that book include not just judgment situations, like in the parenting study, but also ways which cognitive bias will even affect people examining inflexible results, such as mathematics, if the mathematical problem is posed in a way that triggers an emotional response.

For whatever reason, I've locked onto this idea like learning a new word, and now I see it everywhere (the parenting study is one of many examples); and I try to be cognizant of it in my own decision-making, perhaps overly so.

Here's a link to an interview on the subject of bias with psychologist Daniel Kahneman, author of Thinking, Fast and Slow. Please note that I posted the link to the interview, but I haven't read the interview yet. If it proves to be something worthless, I'll find a better link. EDIT: It's a good interview, though not particularly deep, but I still managed to get a new piece from the interview — from the interviewer more than Kahneman himself. :)

If you're curious about Thinking, Fast and Slow, it's not an in-depth psychology book by any means. It's an anecdotal popcorn book on many different topics. I give this book my highest recommendation, especially if you like Freakonomics or even something like Imponderables. This one is more useful, though. EDIT: I was reminded by reading the interview that while each chapter does contain different examples, the book is tied together by Kahneman's general notion of a "fast brain" and a "slow brain."

Anyway, the parenting study also reminded me of another article I'd seen within the past couple of years or so. I might have even been led to it by a link here on LGK. The choices I make are not influenced by man sources. :) This other article was about the changing attitude toward parenting in general. Specifically, it was about how, as a mother, if you speak of your child in anything other than doting terms today, you will be harangued from every direction, while that wasn't always the case. I'm neither a parent, nor a woman, so I know nothing of that from experience, but it seemed to dovetail nicely with this article, too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's an interesting experiment, but not surprising.

I wish cognitive bias was a concept I'd been introduced to much earlier, but I did not read about such a thing until reading the book Thinking, Fast and Slow several years ago. The examples from that book include not just judgment situations, like in the parenting study, but also ways which cognitive bias will even affect people examining inflexible results, such as mathematics, if the mathematical problem is posed in a way that triggers an emotional response.

For whatever reason, I've locked onto this idea like learning a new word, and now I see it everywhere (the parenting study is one of many examples); and I try to be cognizant of it in my own decision-making, perhaps overly so.

Here's a link to an interview on the subject of bias with psychologist Daniel Kahneman, author of Thinking, Fast and Slow. Please note that I posted the link to the interview, but I haven't read the interview yet. If it proves to be something worthless, I'll find a better link. EDIT: It's a good interview, though not particularly deep, but I still managed to get a new piece from the interview ? from the interviewer more than Kahneman himself. :)

If you're curious about Thinking, Fast and Slow, it's not an in-depth psychology book by any means. It's an anecdotal popcorn book on many different topics. I give this book my highest recommendation, especially if you like Freakonomics or even something like Imponderables. This one is more useful, though. EDIT: I was reminded by reading the interview that while each chapter does contain different examples, the book is tied together by Kahneman's general notion of a "fast brain" and a "slow brain."

Anyway, the parenting study also reminded me of another article I'd seen within the past couple of years or so. I might have even been led to it by a link here on LGK. The choices I make are not influenced by man sources. :) This other article was about the changing attitude toward parenting in general. Specifically, it was about how, as a mother, if you speak of your child in anything other than doting terms today, you will be harangued from every direction, while that wasn't always the case. I'm neither a parent, nor a woman, so I know nothing of that from experience, but it seemed to dovetail nicely with this article, too.

I've read Thinking, Fast and Slow!! It taught me thangs!

cartoon-dolphin-holding-book-isolated-white-background-illustration-61938966.jpg
 
I have the book on my shelf but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. I actually think I picked it up from one of you guys suggesting it in the "what are you reading" thread
 
LOL. Actually, our 4 (count 'em) 4, cats are all pretty affectionate but they do have their moments.

We are currently up to 5 after a feral momcat had 3 kittens in our backyard then was killed by a coyote so we raised the 3 inside with our other 2.
I can attest they understand the spoken word just fine, Snack , Lunch , Food , Dinner and surprisingly Time For Bed as we call that out and several race to see who gets the prime spots at the foot of our bed.
 
Last edited:
Wonder what happened to Philae...

[video]http://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/humans-just-got-our-first-close-up-look-at-a-rare-eruption-in-space/vi-AAiq8aN[/video]
 
Back
Top