kingnut
Top Forward
He would need to develop a mean streak....Clarke is listed at 6’ 3”, 200 lbs. on the Reign website.
He would need to develop a mean streak....Clarke is listed at 6’ 3”, 200 lbs. on the Reign website.
He will gain more weight and at 220lbs he will be solid, I agree with you, not this season but next. It's always a good thing to have good players to trade to get picks or a need.Clarke is listed at 6’ 3”, 200 lbs. on the Reign website.
If Clarke gets to 220 and keeps his speed and skill then he would be a monster.He will gain more weight and at 220lbs he will be solid, I agree with you, not this season but next. It's always a good thing to have good players to trade to get picks or a need.
I'd be happy if he reported at 210 - 212 next camp. Still young and filling out.If Clarke gets to 220 and keeps his speed and skill then he would be a monster.
^^^^^^Clarke skates like Durzi I think.. below average acceleration and an average top speed once he hits his stride.
Furthermore, while he does not have a size issue, I am pretty sure he does not have much of a physical component to his game, hence the cowering he did when Mark Stone shamed him in the preseason.
I think "Roy's Spot" next year might not be there regardless of what we might want.^^^^^^
Cant see him taking Roys spot next yr. Not physical enough
I think "Roy's Spot" next year might not be there regardless of what we might want.
Consider the following:
I worry that Roy is pricing himself out of our price range unless the cap goes up significantly and he's open to a bridge.
- Next year we have several key pieces that need new contracts (Arvy, Byfield, Spence, Lizzo, Goalies, etc)
- The AAV for both Gav & Mikey's contracts are both significantly big jumps from Roy's current contract (3.1 vs. 4.1 & 5.8)
- Roy's performance has been and continues to be great, and the better he does the more other teams will be at the table come contract negotiation time.
In this case yeah. When you’re playing to contend then letting a UFA walk for free is like the same as giving up assets for a rental. Only in this case you don’t get assets you could have had. Still, gotta push in the chips when it’s appropriate.I guess it’s better to lose Roy for nothing than to maximize the asset. He gives the Kings the best chance to win this year. Who cares if you lose him for nothing next year.
MOAR SIZE!Maybe… maybe… trade a first and player and a prospect for a star at the deadline? Like a put all the chips in type of move?
Emphasis on pipe.Like my pipe dream, PLD, a first and Roy for Draisaital. Bring up Clarke and see what happens.
Yah.. but what would get Drai? I heard the same thing when I said Quick would be moved.Emphasis on pipe.
Not a 60-70 pt player signed to 8 years for one.Yah.. but what would get Drai? I heard the same thing when I said Quick would het moved.