Statue4Deano
Super Star
If the Dodgers are the blueprint for the Lakers then the building matters quite a bit.Just a thought as I read this...
IF (and I don;t KNOW this is true but IF) the valuation of the organization is in any way tied to ownership of the building... does the overall value of the franchise necessarily have anything to do with the Kings?
If the Lakers are turned back into a perrenial contender and maintain their position as a global brand does the building they play in not continue to generate value as a platform for advertising and sponsorship?
The building has three regular tennants (Lakers/Sparks/Kings) not to mention concerts, events etc... despite it's age if the Lakers are any good and continue to play there the building maintains it's position as one of the most visible arenas in the world.
Current Dodgers ownership has invested a more than $300M in radical improvements and modernizations to Dodgers stadium since they took control in 2012. I’d imagine they’d like to do something similar for the Lakers but they’d have to own the arena first. Only problem is Crypto isn’t for sale.