The Comic Books and Comic Book movies thread

Universal Acquires David Guggenheim's 364

Judging from the number of projects Ron Howard is attached to, his ambitious adaptation of The Dark Tower looks to be all but dead. Deadline reports that Universal has acquired a pitch entitled 364 from David Guggenheim, and Ron Howard is set to direct. The film revolves around a man who, on one day each year, has superpowers. The title refers to the number of days a year he spends thinking about what heroic deeds he will perform when the day comes.
 
Don't say that. :nono:

I am actually thinking about following some of the relaunch titles on a monthly basis. I am not selling out, but buying in. :D

I wish DC nothing but luck. At least the relaunch has signs of originality/creativity instead of the machine like LATHERRINSEREPEAT of Marvel. So, please do.
 
I wish DC nothing but luck. At least the relaunch has signs of originality/creativity instead of the machine like LATHERRINSEREPEAT of Marvel. So, please do.

I fully expected to hate every single thing about "The New 52"....

but so far I have fairly to really enjoyed everything I've seen.

Especially Animal Man and Detective Comics.
 
The Hellfire Club Movie That Never Was, And The X-Men Movies That Might Be Soon Bleeding Cool Comic Book, Movies and TV News and Rumors

I had always wanted to do the Hellfire Club because they’re really fascinating. I almost wanted to spin them off into another movie… It didn’t get to script. It got to formulating who we would use and which story we would use because there’s the whole Jean Grey part of the Hellfire story. I like the whole Jean Grey involvement. I thought that was really interesting.

That initial appearance in Xmen was pretty much the high water mark in X-comics(and top 5 as far as comic team story lines) as far as I am concerned. It's all been pretty downhill since then.
 
How is this 'cool'? I have seen a lot of artist swapping going on in the relaunch of the 52 so far. Not exactly a strong way to basically reboot a whole universe when you can't maintain consistent artwork through the first 10 issues of some real hard sell kind of books. DC seems to have learned nothing from Marvel. I mean, christ, the blueprint is there, it's been done...yet DC can't even follow a simple blueprint. Yeah, it's good that they are trying to make substitute artists work organically, but there shouldn't be that problem before the title hits #10. If the guy is too busy, they should have got someone else. I know you want Swamp Thing to return to the heights Adgy...this ain't the way to do it if you ask me. Everything DC has done has come with an element of dodginess to it. It pains me because i hate marvel and have always been a DC guy, but they just keep finding the damned banana peel.

What i think is cool (and I don't mean Cool!!!, i mean cool) is that they are aware of his inability to meet the schedule and so are doing fill ins in a structured way. Such a nice change of pace from books being constantly late or having a ****ty fill in artist because no one else is available. At least this way, it can be planned ahead.

It's not that I'm excited about it, I'm just glad they're heading it off at the pass.
 
I fully expected to hate every single thing about "The New 52"....

but so far I have fairly to really enjoyed everything I've seen.

Especially Animal Man and Detective Comics.

What about JLA? :P

I just picked up this week's books yesterday and haven't read them. Today's lunch hour will be Swamp Thing, Animal Man and Action Comics!
 
What i think is cool (and I don't mean Cool!!!, i mean cool) is that they are aware of his inability to meet the schedule and so are doing fill ins in a structured way. Such a nice change of pace from books being constantly late or having a ****ty fill in artist because no one else is available. At least this way, it can be planned ahead.

It's not that I'm excited about it, I'm just glad they're heading it off at the pass.

Fair enough. Now that you differentiated and went all lower case, I agree with you.
 


‘Super’…The Animated Series?!
http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2011/09/09/super-the-animated-series/

James Gunn, the former Troma Films writer who hit pay dirt with the script for the 2004 Zack Snyder-directed remake of Dawn of the Dead and made his directorial debut in 2006 with the sci-fi horror comedy Slither, has uncovered something very interesting which he linked to his Twitter feed just recently.

Animation company Toonsmyth Productions has put together a 90-second video trailer for a mock cartoon based on Gunn’s most recent film, the subversive superhero comedy Super that starred Rainn Wilson as a lonely and disturbed man who becomes a costumed crimefighter named the Crimson Bolt, in the hope that some network might pick it up for a series, possibly the Cartoon Network for their Adult Swim line-up. You can watch the video here below.



The animation is very crude, but it’s just a test run. Personally I think a Super cartoon series, while conceptually awesome, would contradict the events of the movie. Seeing the further adventures of the Crimson Bolt and his even more ****ed-up sidekick Boltie (played in the film by Ellen Page) done up as a goofy late-night cartoon would break my heart. Super was one of my favorite films so far released this year. It’s complete and perfect. It doesn’t need to live on as a cartoon. Gunn’s movie was about more than that.
 
Last edited:
What about JLA?

Wellllll...

Two things.

One - If you're operating under the assumption that this is a reboot and should presuppose no prior knowledge of the characters... then Justice League was annoyingly bad. If you had no prior knowledge of "Green Lanterns" or the DCU then you would probably spend half the book saying "WTF is this?" and "WTF was that?"

Two - If you want a comic book where two characters basically wave their dicks at each other for 20 pages then by all means... enjoy.
 
Have you seen, or do you have any interest in 'SUPER' Doc...it's a LOT similar to that Kat Dennings/Woody Harrelson flick(cannot for the life of me remember the name)...but a little more solid movie wise. I think you might enjoy it, or at least have an interesting opinion about it.
 
Have you seen, or do you have any interest in 'SUPER' Doc...it's a LOT similar to that Kat Dennings/Woody Harrelson flick(cannot for the life of me remember the name)...but a little more solid movie wise. I think you might enjoy it, or at least have an interesting opinion about it.

I've been meaning to see it but I just have this sense that I won't enjoy it.
 

What a douche.

Wellllll...

Two things.

One - If you're operating under the assumption that this is a reboot and should presuppose no prior knowledge of the characters... then Justice League was annoyingly bad. If you had no prior knowledge of "Green Lanterns" or the DCU then you would probably spend half the book saying "WTF is this?" and "WTF was that?"

Two - If you want a comic book where two characters basically wave their dicks at each other for 20 pages then by all means... enjoy.

Ok, this is a review I mostly agree with. It actually felt a lot like All Star Batman And Robin...

Defendor...that's the WH/KD flick. Super is worth seeing. Awkward pacing and very diy, but definitely worth a watch. Almost an Anti-Superhero movie.

What was your take on Defendor, JD? I just DVR'ed it.
 
Ok, this is a review I mostly agree with. It actually felt a lot like All Star Batman And Robin...

I have now come to believe that Geoff Johns has no decent original ideas. It seems to me that most of the decent stories from GL over the last 5 - 6 years were all cribbed from Alan Moore characters and ideas and now, exactly as you've said, he's aping the style of Frank Miller.

We'll see how it plays out but so far I'm not terribly impressed.... and issue two is supposed to feature a fight between Superman and Batman..... where did I see that before.............

batman_vs_superman_wallpaper-300x225.jpg
 
Back
Top