The Comic Books and Comic Book movies thread

David Mazzucchelli Hopes People Don’t Buy Batman Year One | Bleeding Cool Comic Book, Movies and TV News and Rumors

DC just sent me this book last week, and I really hope people don’t buy it. I didn’t even know they were making it, and I don’t understand why they thought it was necessary — several years ago, DC asked me if I’d help put together a deluxe edition ofBatman: Year One, and Dale Crain and I worked for months to try to make a definitive version. Now whoever’s in charge has thrown all that work in the garbage. First, they redesigned the cover, and recolored my artwork — probably to look more like their little DVD that came out last year; second, they printed the book on shiny paper, which was never a part of the original design, all the way back to the first hardcover in 1988; third — and worst — they printed the color from corrupted, out-of-focus digital files, completely obscuring all of Richmond’s hand-painted work. Anybody who’s already paid for this should send it back to DC and demand a refund.

C'mon, DC... you need to be better than this.
 
Chronicle 2 Is Coming | Bleeding Cool Comic Book, Movies and TV News and Rumors

I was surprised how little advanced excitement and anticipation there was in the geekosphere for Chronicle. Here was that thing so many nerds say they want: an original story, well told, with character and surprises, and a tone that deserved to be taken seriously. Had it been brand-named, I think people would have lost their minds for it.

But it wasn’t. And I guess people are shallow. Whenever I saw somebody namecheck Akira in describing Chronicle, and it happened a lot, I remembered how much fuss was being made over a going-nowhere American do-over of that story while this film was being relatively neglected. All because of the name on the front page. Just a name.

That’s why the studios keep making condescending, substandard tentpole pap. All they need is a name to sell tickets – and toss in a few more famous names on the cast and crew credits to really get things cooking. But don’t you want to be treated like grown ups? Honestly, it looks like the majority of traffic to online film blogs is made up not of film lovers, but franchise fans, people less interested in whether or not a film is going to be any good than whether or not it has the same name as something else.

How boring.

But Chronicle is out there now, and these blinkered folk can stumble on it by mistake while trolling from brand name to brand name. And when they do, I think they’ll “be surprised” by how much they like it.

So by the time Chronicle 2 comes along, there’s probably going to be something like a waiting audience.

At the moment, the studios seem to be courting director Josh Trank for their pre-set comic book adaptations, from The Fantastic Four to Venom and it’s not entirely clear if he’d come back to make another Chronicle movie, despite it being built on his own original idea. I expect he will at least have first refusal.

Though while we’re waiting to see if that will happen, the first film’s screenwriter, Max Landis, has started work on a script for the second. Deadline note that Landis has other projects in the pipeline, having recently sold Amnesty, a pitch with Ron Howard attached to direct, and that Disney have an original “adventure story” of his on their slate. Keeping busy.

The first Chronicle ends quite nicely, and there aren’t really any loose threads outside of the kind of things that simply don’t need an explanation. Still, there are more stories to be told in the same world, and all Landis will have to do is find one.
 
boys64.jpg


Review: The Boys #64 - Comic Book Resources

I don't know what happened. I remember hearing that there were 2 years left in this title. Now...7 issues left. Simply an amazing book filled with great characters. Rarely does a comic book author hit a home run that not only changes the game, but is remembered forever. Moore did it with Watchmen and Swamp Thing and now Ennis has followed with this and Preacher...yes Adgy I recognize all of his other work, including Hitman(which I love) and Punisher(meh)...but these 2 titles will forever be properties that someone wants to make a movie out of...just to spin wheels. They are just too unwieldy...too perfect, to be pared down. I could go into spoilers, but please...if you are a comic fan, get the first few tpbs. Immerse yerself. And don't be surprised when you get SWEPT up.

From CBR's review of #63

The Boys” is a book scary in its ability to amaze you on such varied levels. The violence is school yard fun while the conniving and plotting behind it all are extremely adult. The gags can be juvenile while the emotional character arcs tend to be more mature and heartbreaking. It seems that the more serious matters get in this book, the better the stories become. Right here, as we face down the end of it all, things are deadly serious and that bodes well for the content and quality to come in the coming months. Everything “The Boys” does well is showcased right here in one issue.
 
Last edited:
Amy Reeder Is Batwoman No More | Bleeding Cool Comic Book, Movies and TV News and Rumors

Amy Reeder was meant to be rotating art on Batwoman with co-writer JH Williams III. She was meant to be drawing the second arc, issues 6 to 11, before JH Williams III would take over for a few issues, and then back to Amy again.

Now it seems that Amy Reeder’s second arc has been cut short. In an article on the DC Source which doesn’t mention Amy once, we learn that Trevor McCarthy will now be drawing issus 9, 10 and 11.

Amy posted today on Facebook, “I know, I know. You found out about it pretty much as soon as it went final, too. It’s definitely regrettable…some real creative differences were going on, to the point that it became untenable.”

Awww, weak.
 
yes Adgy I recognize all of his other work, including Hitman(which I love) and Punisher(meh)...but these 2 titles will forever be properties that someone wants to make a movie out of...just to spin wheels. They are just too unwieldy...too perfect, to be pared down.

Preacher and The Boys are certainly more Epic in their scope than anything else Ennis has written for sure.

Going to be a sad day when the last issue comes out. :(
 
Wow...sad. Another bit of my childhood(definitely the pervier side, c'mon Heavy Metal was like a comic book Playboy) passes. R.I.P.
 
Oh no! :(

I loved Moebius work. One of my schools had a print of one of his works in the student union which always brought me comfort when I used to go study there.

R.I.P
 
Yeah, that really sucks about Moebius. HELL of a ****ing artist. I remember reading the Silver Surfer story he did with Stan Lee for the first time which, coincidentally, comes out in a new hardcover in May and thinking his Galactus was one of the coolest things I'd ever seen up to that point.

moebius-silversurfer-parable-05.jpg


Helps that I was super into Tron at the time, I'm sure.
 
“If DC Want To Soil Themselves In Public And Kill The Reputations Of A Number Of Otherwise Possibly Halfway-Decent Writers And Artists, Then I’m Certainly Not Going To Stop Them. And, I Shall Take My Fun And My Pleasure However It Comes&#

He told me they were planning to do these prequels and sequels, and that he had been offered something in the region of a quarter of a million dollars to oversee the project–that it would be handled by the top talent in the industry, to which I said some quite intemperate things. I said that, as far as Watchmen was concerned, I didn’t really think that there was any talent in the mainstream comics industry. If there had have been, they presumably, sometime over the past 20 or 25 years, would have perhaps come up with something that was as good as Watchmen–or as notable or as memorable–after they’d already been shown how to do it.
It strikes me that, yes, I can understand why they took on Before Watchmen. It will probably be the only opportunity they get in their careers to actually be attached to a project that anybody outside of comics has ever heard of. So, I can see how that would be a great lure. I don’t think I would have done it, though, because to go down in history as the people who did the lame rewrites and prequels to Watchmen–well, that’s not for me. But, of course everybody has to make their own choices. So, no, obviously I won’t want anything to do with any of the people who are attached to this project at any point in the future, but that isn’t a huge loss.

Jesus, what an *******.

have a huge respect for my audience. On the occasions when I meet them, they seem, I like to think, to be intelligent and scrupulous people. If people do want to go out and buy these Watchmen prequels, they would be doing me an enormous favor if they would just stop buying my other books. When I think of my audience, I like to have good thoughts and think about how lucky I am to have one that is as intelligent as mine and as moral as mine.

**** you, I'll buy your books and every goddamn one of the prequels. Suck it.
 
Then STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT SOULLESS REMAKES AND THE LACK OF CREATIVITY IN THE WORLD!!!
 
Then STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT SOULLESS REMAKES AND THE LACK OF CREATIVITY IN THE WORLD!!!

That's a bit of a leap and a bit of an overreaction Doc. Moore is overly simplistic and almost Nazi-like in his empirical beliefs. Isn't it true that the Watchmen were based on the Charlton comics characters? Does not that make him a victim of his own argument? In his overstated opinion nothing good can come of a writer/artist reusing another creators ideas. That makes him a hypocrite. Plus he makes you look absolutely cuddly in comparison as far as being a prickly pear.
 
Back
Top