Well, you know how it is...in the free market, competition gives the customer a better product for a cheaper price!
Can someone shed some light to how this kind of disaster can happen in this day and age? Did Ballys sign a contract that stumped the competitors in order to then try and gouge the customer by either increasing the service fee or offering a sub-par product (meaning they are skimping somewhere to save money), which eventually put them in financial trouble?
What prevents the Kings to offer the "package" of streaming their games to someone else? Are they limited due to contracts or is there no interest on the market?
In Slovenia we have an issue of a couple of big ex-Yu media corporations (big relatively for our region, of course) buying up broadcasting rights for most sports that are popular and they are offering their channels to only one IPTV provider each as part of their program scheme (I think you even have to pay extra for their sports channels)...of course these two providers are the most expensive ones. The trick then is that you can't access to, let's say (not sure this exact situation is true, but something along those lines), both the Champions League football and Basketball Euroleague with the same IPTV provider...you'd need to have both. Which is ridiculous, of course. Additionally, big national team championships like UEFA Euro Cup or Basketball Euro Cup could also be broadcasted by only one of these providers, as they priced out our national media provider (that we all have to pay for anyways) that once provided basically ALL relevant sports broadcasts for both club and national team competitions 10-15 years ago.
Basically, the free market is screwing us up right up our @sses.
Is this a similar situation?