D
darby
Lurker
In your scenario, you are assuming she is at least telling a partial truth. In which case all your arguments are sound. In my scenario, where I question her 'truth'...the current state of 'if you post it, they will believe you' on Twitter allows her to constantly give people a reason to continue to assume guilt. Trial by social media is becoming an alternative to actually having to prove anything. If you have ever been falsely accused...well, it would give you a different perspective.
Okay, so let me ask you this: What makes you question her trustworthiness?
Nothing from her essay is being outright refuted or disproved. Hardwick's seemingly not fighting it outwardly. His response didn't cover a lot of her claims. And she, for her part, is not actively going after him. She said she wanted to say it for her own reasons, she did, and now she's walking away.
Is she getting new jobs? Doing tons of interviews? Writing a book about it? The only things I'm hearing is that Hardwick is slowly coming back.
I get the false accusations thing. I do. I wouldn't want to walk around with it. But why would she say it? Especially knowing that to this point, this may be the most noteworthy thing she's known for among the broadest audience?
Again, I'm weird. I can see a scenario where they're both telling the truth. The way this is playing out reinforces my scenario. And, in the end, Hardwick looks like he's gonna be fine.