W
What party?
Lurker
the whole thing makes zero sense to me.

the whole thing makes zero sense to me.
Plus he would fit the Jewish quota (which has been vacant way too long) on the Kings. Fit it nicely. mhihi:cool:
The only thing which makes sense to me is an Eichel situation (minus neck issues) which is not public - yet.
So what's the MOST you'd give up for him? If it took this much, would you trade all this for him?
Clarke
Turcotte
Anderson or Bjornfot
2022 1st
And if you wouldn't, how do you solve the LD problem?
So what's the MOST you'd give up for him? If it took this much, would you trade all this for him?
Clarke
Turcotte
Anderson or Bjornfot
2022 1st
And if you wouldn't, how do you solve the LD problem?
Gritting my teeth, yeah. None of Turcotte, Anderson or Bjornfot are likely to ever have the value of Chychrun; Clarke and the 1st might, but there's certainly no guarantee. But I think it would take less than that.So what's the MOST you'd give up for him? If it took this much, would you trade all this for him?
Clarke
Turcotte
Anderson or Bjornfot
2022 1st
And if you wouldn't, how do you solve the LD problem?
3 of 4 yes. Not sure we’d have to give up Toby or Mikey when Clarke is going back, but I also understand Yotes need someone to play on the left now, which is why Maata as a throw-in might work. But then it takes even more, maybe another first pick or hell, even Kupari. I’d do that.
I'd pass on that. It makes more holes than it fills. Hockey deals need to work for both sides. I'm actually not sure that return even accomplishes what the yotes want.
Gritting my teeth, yeah. None of Turcotte, Anderson or Bjornfot are likely to ever have the value of Chychrun; Clarke and the 1st might, but there's certainly no guarantee. But I think it would take less than that.
Thanks for playing because that's my point. Kings fans can WANT to trade less. But young #1 Dmen cost a lot to acquire. 21 yr old Seth Jones cost proven (33 and 26 goal seasons) 23 yr old Ryan Johansen. 27 (not young and overpaid one dimensional) Brent Burns cost stud prospect Charlie Coyle + young proven scorer (31, 20, & 22 goals) Setoguchi + swapping 1st & 2nd rounders). Dougie Hamilton (who was a malcontent and a problem in the locker room Chychrun is not) cost a 1st and 2 2nds. Trouba (who isn't the #1 Dman Chychrun is) cost top prospect Pionk and a 1st.
The King's won't solve their LD problem unless they're willing to give to get.
....I'm actually not sure that return even accomplishes what the yotes want.
Alright then. So do you just keep going with Bjornfot, Anderson, and guys like Edler and Maatta? And bet that Nousiainen is gonna be a dynamic LD?
Well, let's see. I've read through this quickly and this is an interesting thread. The most pertinent point was made by jammer:
....I'm actually not sure that return even accomplishes what the yotes want.
Exactly. What do they want? Frankly, the whole idea make NO SENSE. Why would the Yotes want to trade this guy? So it's difficult to come up with anything if you don't know the motivation AND those motivations (on the surface at least) don't make a lot of sense.
But...I'll bite. If the Kings are involved what is it they can trade to satisfy? First of all if I'm the Yotes why come to the Kings? One reason: they are loaded with centers. And where do you start? With Byfield, obviously. So do the Kings move their top prospect for this LD they need? IMO, no they don't. Why? Well, I think the center position is more important and the fact the Kings would need to add more to get the deal done. So I pass on this one. And to answer jt's question: What about the LD? Well, you push it down the line and work on it later....
What next? Turcotte seems obvious. So with him what else could you give? I'd consider Turcotte, 2022 1st plus ONE of the defensemen. More than this goes beyond jt's previous trades summary IMO. So:
Turcotte
Anderson OR Bjornfot OR Clarke (only ONE)
2022 1st
This would be about as far as I'd go. Does this satisfy Arizona (eventually Houston)? Who knows? I haven't a clue given what I alluded to earlier since this idea of Chychrun makes little sense to me....
I don’t believe in making trades that still leave a hole, so giving up Mikey or Toby means you still have guys like Edler and Maata in that third LD spot. If one of them has to be included on top of everything else suggested, then it’s not the trade I’d be comfortable with Rob making.
I think the price is too high (a first plus two top-10 picks) but I get it. Prospects are just that-- guys who might be stars but who have not done anything in the NHL. Chychrun is a legit NHL star (at least he was last year when Arizona still iced a competitive team). This table is pretty illustrative on how prospects are just a lottery ticket.
![]()
If I'm the Kings, I JUMP at that trade even if I've gotta add another pick or 2nd tier prospect like Vilardi, Kupari, Fagemo, JAD, Madden, Spence, or Grans.
And that's really my point in this. If you don't "overpay" for Chychrun, what DO you do? Nothing?
I do agree there usually isn't much information as to why trades are made. The best anyone can do is see the surface.
Obviously, GMs know more. Who knows, Chychryn might be a POS also...
As to additions: I agree there. My idea...which I should have been more clear...I'd only move ONE d-man (or or or..etc) especially if it has to be Clarke. Adding another forward is OK, IMO. Adding a Vilardi or Kupari isn't a bad idea actually.