Meh, I hope this thread doest turn into that tired debate. IMHO, Punk is ultimately a state of mind and not the stupid "Brand" it?s unfortunately become. Threads like this inevitably turn into an ?F-U! My subgenre is better Punk than your subgenre?? and things get ugly. I hope we don?t go in that direction. I may disagree with what someone a lot younger than me may consider Punk, but it?s all relative. I?ve been fortunate enough to live through the heyday of the latter beginning, middle, and (what I would consider) the end of Punk. That gives me a better knowledge base to draw my conclusions from. Now if someone comes on here and says ?Green Day is the best Punk band ever!? I?d call them lame and probably Ving them in the head?Now THAT?S PUNK!
Case in point, and I?m probably gonna get flamed but I've ALWAYS had a tough time calling the Ramones Punk (let 'er rip!)?.that?s just me. I?m SURE there are some OG punks on here that would consider that to be Blasphemous...and maybe rightfully so. They would probably also consider Hardcore and thereafter to be garbage. But my introduction to Punk came after the Ramones had already laid the groundwork.
So, it would be highly hypocritical of me to say anything that came after Hardcore is crap. I?ll give anything a listening to and if its crap, it?s based on its content and not its label.
And thats that on it from me...